Harry Reid has earned the scorn that's come his way for D.C. dysfunction

by The Oklahoman Editorial Board Published: January 29, 2014
Advertisement
;

IN 2010, Republican candidates ran against U.S. Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif, as much as they ran against their actual opponents. This year, that distinction is going to U.S. Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., although for a different reason. Pelosi was the sincere-if-misguided face of out-of-control, Big Government liberalism. Reid is the poster child for — and primary cause of — Washington dysfunction and toxicity.

In a video announcing his Senate candidacy, Rep. James Lankford, R-Oklahoma City, pointedly noted, “The Senate is currently the most contentious body in our government. Harry Reid and the Senate Democrats are dividing Americans for political gain. I want to continue to bring Oklahoma common sense and solutions to a place that needs both.” Echoing Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Muskogee, Lankford has repeatedly noted that Reid's leadership has increased discord and stifled debate in the nation's capital.

In neighboring Arkansas, U.S. Rep. Tom Cotton is challenging incumbent Democratic Sen. Mark Pryor. Cotton recently released a video bluntly titled, “Let's Fire Harry Reid in 2014.” Cotton urges voters to “take back the Senate from Harry Reid's control.”

There's a reason Reid has become the focus of those upset over Washington's inability to govern: He's earned it!

In a recent Wall Street Journal column, Kimberley A. Strassel acknowledged the 113th Congress was likely to be one of the least productive in history (as measured by bills becoming law), but she noted that the Republican-controlled House actually passed more than 200 bills in 2013. In contrast, the Democratic-controlled Senate didn't pass a single appropriations bill. Of 72 bills signed into law last year, 56 originated in the House.

Reid also has used procedural maneuvers to prevent amendments and associated debate. From July through early January, Republicans were able to offer only four amendments. Overall, Republicans were allowed to offer 74 amendments last year, but The New York Times reported that half came during a single 24-hour marathon when the Senate voted on 37 nonbinding advisory amendments to the Senate budget. In other words, Reid mostly allows amendments that have no impact.


by The Oklahoman Editorial Board
The Oklahoman Editorial Board consists of Gary Pierson, President and CEO of The Oklahoma Publishing Company; Christopher P. Reen, president and publisher of The Oklahoman; Kelly Dyer Fry, editor and vice president of news; Christy Gaylord...
+ show more


Trending Now


AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    Police: Gunman and victim in Loop shooting 'had been friends for years'
  2. 2
    Every Ridiculous Moment Of 'Sharknado 2' In Two Minutes
  3. 3
    Bill Clinton's Chilling Statements Hours Before 9/11 Attacks
  4. 4
    This Interactive Map Shows The Wealthiest Person In Each State
  5. 5
    Restaurant receipt gives 15 percent discount for 'Praying in Public'
+ show more