Health care plan could hit wealthy with big tax hikes
By The Associated Press
Comments
0
Published: November 3, 2009
WASHINGTON — The typical family would be spared higher taxes from the House Democratic plan to overhaul health care, and their low-income neighbors could come out ahead.
Their wealthy counterparts, however, face big tax increases that could eventually hit future generations of taxpayers who are less wealthy.
The bill is funded largely from a 5.4 percent tax on individuals making more than $500,000 a year and couples making more than $1 million, starting in 2011. The tax increase would hit only 0.3 percent of tax filers, raising $460.5 billion over the next 10 years, according to congressional estimates.
But unlike other income tax rates, the new tax would not be indexed for inflation. As incomes rise over time because of inflation, more families — and more small business owners — would be hit by the tax.
In 2011, a family of four with an income of $800,000 a year would get a $24,000 tax increase, when the new tax is combined with an increase in the top two tax brackets proposed by
President Barack Obama and other scheduled tax changes, according to an analysis by
Deloitte Tax. That’s a 12.5 percent increase in federal income taxes.
"These are very big numbers and very high effective tax rates,” said
Clint Stretch, a tax policy expert at Deloitte Tax.
The new health care tax would come on top of other tax increases for the wealthy proposed by Obama. The top marginal income tax rate now is 35 percent, on income above $372,950. Obama wants to boost the top rate to 39.6 percent in 2011 by allowing some of the tax cuts enacted under former
President George W. Bush to expire.
House Democrats said they are proud that they found a way to finance the health care package largely from a tax on the wealthy. There is, however, little appetite for a millionaire’s tax in the Senate, where some hope to eventually use tax increases on the wealthy to help close the growing federal budget deficit.
"If health care is a benefit that is worth having, then it’s worth paying for,” said
William Gale, who was an adviser to
President George H. W. Bush’s
Council of Economic Advisers and is now co-director of the
Tax Policy Center.
"This gives the impression that it’s only worth having if someone else pays for it,” Gale said.
Under the bill, individuals are required to obtain health insurance coverage or pay penalties, which are described as taxes in the legislation.
The penalty would be equal to the cost of an average insurance plan or a 2.5 percent tax on incomes above the standard threshold for filing a tax return, whichever is less.
To help afford insurance, families with incomes up to four times the federal poverty level would qualify for subsidies. The poverty level for a family of four is $22,050 this year.
Related Topics:
U.S. Government,
Public Finance,
Domestic Policy,
Federal Budget,
Political Policy,
Politics,
U.S. Politics,
World Politics,
Economic Issues,
Income Taxes,
Taxes,
Political Parties,
Economic Policy,
Tax Policy,
Poverty
Leave a Comment
News Photo Galleriesview all
Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online
Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.
Log in below or sign up (it's free).