In cases of seized art, answers aren't always easy to find, Oklahoma legal expert says

by Silas Allen Modified: January 24, 2014 at 9:36 pm •  Published: January 24, 2014

— News that a painting hanging in the University of Oklahoma's Fred Jones Jr. Museum of Art was seized by the Nazis during World War II prompted public demands that the university return the painting to the family that owned it before the war.

But answers in cases like this one are rarely as simple as that, an art law expert said, and outcomes can often vary widely from one case to the next.

The painting is “Shepherdess Bringing In Sheep,” an 1886 work by French impressionist artist Camille Pissarro. It was seized as part of the personal collection of Raoul Meyer, a Jewish businessman in Paris, during the Nazi occupation of France.

Meyer's daughter, Leone Meyer, is suing OU in hopes of recovering the painting. But OU officials have refused to return the work, citing a previous court ruling in Switzerland that denied the family's claim to the painting.

In response to the issue, local residents contacted OU officials and took to social media demanding the university return the painting to the Meyer family.

On Facebook, Oklahoma City resident Gary Bourlier said it was “sad the lady has to sue when it's obvious the right thing is to give it back.”

“Here's an opportunity to right a wrong, this shouldn't be difficult,” Bourlier said.

Norman resident Robert Cole agreed, saying on Facebook that returning the painting would allow Oklahoma to see itself in a “clearer, brighter light.”

“This is one painting that was pilfered from a family home,” Cole said. “Not only is the remedy easy for us, it comforts the surviving members of families who were the systematic target of a modern horror.”

Deborah Tussey, a professor at the Oklahoma City University School of Law, said a number of regulations exist that require museums to look into the provenance of any artworks they require, particularly with regard to the Nazi era. If museum officials find evidence that the painting was seized during the war, the museum is expected to make that information public, she said.

Although those regulations might seem clear-cut, they generally only exist in museum organizations' bylaws and they don't carry the force of law. That means museums can exercise a certain amount of discretion when deciding whether to follow them.

“They're not laws,” Tussey said. “The guidelines are there, but they're not obligatory.”

To confuse the matter further, laws regarding stolen art don't always agree from one country to the next. In the United States, the title to a stolen artwork can't be transferred from the thief to a buyer. But under Swiss law, someone who buys a stolen painting in good faith can obtain a title to the work, Tussey said.

by Silas Allen
General Assignment/Breaking News Reporter
Silas Allen is a news reporter for The Oklahoman. He is a Missouri native and a 2008 graduate of the University of Missouri.
+ show more


Trending Now


AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    Life After Ice Buckets: ALS Group Faces $94 Million Challenge
  2. 2
    Jalen Saunders had to be physicially restrained during seizure
  3. 3
    Kansas City's Oklahoma Joe's restaurant taking state out of name
  4. 4
    Former prison warden present at botched execution in Arizona hired by OK DOC
  5. 5
    Multimillionaire CEO Caught On Tape Kicking Puppy (GRAPHIC VIDEO)
+ show more