Share “In Washington, cutting any spending is a...”

In Washington, cutting any spending is a challenge

by The Oklahoman Editorial Board Modified: September 19, 2013 at 7:11 pm •  Published: September 20, 2013

DEBATE over a federal food stamp bill continues to prove just how difficult it is to cut any spending in Washington.

For the first time in decades, U.S. House members have split food stamp legislation from the federal farm bill, addressing the two issues in separate legislation. The House on Thursday approved a plan by Republican leaders that would cut spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program by about $40 billion over the next decade.

This sounds impressive until you recall that spending on SNAP, as the food stamp program is known today, has doubled in recent years. In 2008, food stamp spending totaled around $40 billion. In the most recent fiscal year, it totaled roughly $80 billion. Without reform, the food stamp program would expend $764.4 billion over the next 10 years.

The House GOP bill would pare that to $724 billion, which averages $72.4 billion per year. In short, the Republican bill would leave food stamp spending as much as 81 percent higher than it was as recently as 2008. Yet liberals will still decry this as a draconian cut virtually condemning people to starve in the streets.

Under the Republican bill, states will no longer be allowed to waive limited work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents. Stacy Dean, an official with the left-leaning Center of Budget and Policy Priorities, responded by telling The Wall Street Journal, “It's extraordinary to say to a jobless, unemployed individual, ‘You're not working, so I'm going to take away your food assistance.'”

When the Oklahoma Legislature approved modest work requirements for food stamp recipients this year, that measure also drew scorn from the political left.

But if you can't require a healthy adult with no children to at least look for a job in exchange for food stamps, it's hard to argue the program is a true safety net rather than a hammock.

If spending cuts prove politically untenable (which shouldn't be the case if reason ruled), why not ensure food stamps supply recipients with healthy foods? U.S. Rep. Phil Roe, R-Tenn., has filed legislation to prevent food stamps from being used to buy junk food. Yet we doubt this simple, common-sense measure will become law. Research conducted by Yale's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity and published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine in 2012 found that between $1.7 billion and $2.1 billion in food stamp purchases were for soda.

Continue reading this story on the...

by The Oklahoman Editorial Board
The Oklahoman Editorial Board consists of Gary Pierson, President and CEO of The Oklahoma Publishing Company; Christopher P. Reen, president and publisher of The Oklahoman; Kelly Dyer Fry, editor and vice president of news; Christy Gaylord...
+ show more


  1. 1
    Florida State Seminoles QB De'Andre Johnson dismissed by program after video shows him striking...
  2. 2
    Why People Post Annoying Status Updates on Facebook
  3. 3
    'Can't Buy Me Love' Actress Dies at 43
  4. 4
    Bill Cosby said he got drugs to give women for sex
  5. 5
    Reports: David West agrees to veteran minimum deal to play for Spurs
+ show more