Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford

U.S. jobless rate tops 10 pct. for first time since 1983

By CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER, AP Economics Writer    Comments Comment on this article20
Published: November 6, 2009

WASHINGTON — The unemployment rate has surpassed 10 percent for the first time since 1983 — and is likely to go higher.

Advertisement

Nearly 16 million people can't find jobs even though the worst recession since the Great Depression has apparently ended. The Labor Department said Friday that the economy shed a net total of 190,000 jobs in October, less than the downwardly revised 219,000 lost in September. August job losses were also revised lower, to 154,000 from 201,000.

But the loss of jobs last month exceeded economists' estimates. It's the 22nd straight month the U.S. economy has shed jobs, the longest on records dating back 70 years.

Counting those who have settled for part-time jobs or stopped looking for work, the unemployment rate would be 17.5 percent, the highest on records dating from 1994.

The jobless rate rose to 10.2 percent from 9.8 percent in September. Economists say it could climb as high as 10.5 percent next year because employers remain reluctant to hire.

Friday's report is the first since the government said last week that the economy grew at a 3.5 percent annual rate in the July-September quarter, the strongest signal yet that the economy is rebounding. But that isn't fast enough to spur rapid hiring, raising the specter of a jobless recovery.

"You need explosive growth to take the unemployment rate down," said Dan Greenhaus, chief economic strategist for New York-based investment firm Miller Tabak & Co.

Greenhaus said the economy soared by nearly 8 percent in 1983 after a steep recession, lowering the jobless rate by 2.5 percentage points that year. But the economy is unlikely to improve that fast this time, as consumers remain cautious and tight credit hinders businesses. In fact, many analysts expect economic growth to moderate early next year, as the impact of various government stimulus programs fades.

Many economists also worry that persistently high unemployment could undermine the recovery by restraining consumer spending, which accounts for 70 percent of the economy.

One sign of how hard it still is to find a job: the number of Americans who have been out of work for six months or longer rose to 5.6 million, a record. They comprise 35.6 percent of the unemployed population, matching a record set last month.

Congress sought to address the impact of long-term unemployment this week by approving legislation extending jobless benefits for the fourth time since the recession began. The bill would add 14 to 20 extra weeks of aid and is intended to prevent almost 2 million recipients from running out of unemployment insurance during the upcoming holiday season. President Barack Obama is expected to quickly sign the legislation.

The employment report showed that job losses remain widespread across many industries. Manufacturers eliminated a net total of 61,000 jobs, the most in four months. Construction shed 62,000 jobs, down slightly from the previous month.

Retailers, the financial sector and leisure and hospitality companies all continued to reduce payrolls. The economy has lost a net total of 7.3 million jobs since the recession began in December 2007.

The average work week was unchanged at 33 hours, a disappointment because employers are expected to add more hours for current workers before they begin hiring new ones.

There were some bright spots in the report. Professional and business services companies added 18,000 jobs. And temporary employment grew by 33,700 jobs, after losing positions for months. That's a positive sign because employers are likely to add temporary workers before hiring permanent ones.

Still, economists expect jobs likely will remain scarce even as the economy improves. Diane Swonk, chief economist at Mesirow Financial, said that small businesses, a primary engine of job creation, still face tight credit and don't have the cash reserves to support extra workers.

And many companies are squeezing more production from their existing work forces. Productivity, the amount of output per hour worked, jumped 9.5 percent in the third quarter, the Labor Department said Thursday.

That's the sharpest increase in six years and followed a 6.9 percent rise in the second quarter. The increases enable companies to produce more without hiring extra people.

Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford





Need Affordable Health Care?
Get Affordable Health Insurance Quotes Online - Plans from $30 / Month
USInsuranceOnline.com

Auto Insurance Quotes
Fill Out 1 Easy Form and Get 5 Competitive Quotes Today!
www.NetQuote.com


Leave a Comment

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online

Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.


Log in below or sign up (it's free).





Drink up...
Kevin, Oklahoma City - Nov 7, 2009 at 12:26 pm
Reagan took an economy worse than this and despite the idiot democrats in congress, made them turn away from their socialistic ideas. Made it better throughout, against their wishes. Today, we had a democrat congress during the last two years of the spendaholic Bush(economically completely different than Reagan) who tried to outspend these democrat welfare queens, then we quadrupled the mess by electing an outspoken socialist president(Obama is much to the left of Carter) whose entire plan was to cripple the US economy by spending us past our means into oblivion so the government could be there to save the day for the peasantry just so they could set themselves up for re-election.

I know that was a quick scenario, but it's spot on. I don't have time to continue your education, Kevin. Gotta go!
Brock, Beaver - Nov 6, 2009 at 6:10 pm
Highest unemployment since the Reagan years? Wasn't Reagan real fond of tax cuts? Remind me how that worked out. Also, remind me who was driving the train that got us into this fix...
Kevin, Oklahoma City - Nov 6, 2009 at 5:22 pm
Higher unemployment? Going accordingly to Obama's plan.
Brock, Beaver - Nov 6, 2009 at 3:11 pm
It would be nice if all economics filtered through the whole system in 9 months, but that's just not reality. It took Reagan almost 3 years before things got better and it took W Bush 5 years before he created one job. I know you Obama haters want him to fail and blame him for everything under the sun. But, that's just not the way the system works.
--
Milkman, Oklahoma City - Nov 6, 2009 at 3:00 pm
Awww, Milkman. Your 11:32am post smacks of Rosie O'donnell. Please explain why businesses should not have uncertainty about their future business prospects with the double spectre of Cap & Trade and an ill defined healthcare agenda looming as huge operational and financial hindrances. Help all of us see that cap & trade and the proposed healthcare bill are nothing but benign issues that won't upset any business plans or operations. The Dem leaders have controlled congress for 2 years and they have had the Whitehouse muscle for almost a year. If there were an economically intelligent effort practiced by the Dem party shouldn't businesses by now start believing bigger profit and growth opportunities are right ahead and start hiring?
Say it, isn't so - Nov 6, 2009 at 1:27 pm
I thought Black Jesus was going to fix everything once he took office???
Louis Friend, Norman - Nov 6, 2009 at 1:18 pm
Milkman, I agree with your account of Bush's blame. But since Obama took over in Jan. he is responsible for the deaths after he took office. Making Obama and the Democratic Congress responsible for over 1,000 deaths and a recession that has turned into a depression. Don't you agree?
UnSub, Yukon - Nov 6, 2009 at 12:50 pm
If that's the case, than George W Bush and a Republican Congress was 100% responsible for the deaths of over 3000 innocent Americans. The Republicans were 100% responsible for the worst terrorist attack in the history of our country.

I think I would rather be responsible for a bad economy.
--
Milkman, Oklahoma City - Nov 6, 2009 at 11:32 am
Milkman, the blame GW for everything is completely worn out. The Dems now own this economy. The Dems have the golden opportunity to be the real heroes here if they just disregard their lefty extremists in the party. I trust you've had some economics 101. The current Dem leaders have no interest in righting the economic downturn. It's the lefty extremists agenda that is the only thing keeping a real recovery from happening.
Say it, isn't so - Nov 6, 2009 at 11:17 am
The recession is over because we just printed billions upon billions of dollars, this report does not acknowledge any inflation! End the FED = sound money = more freedom and liberty! No, instead we give the FED more power and it doesn't even have to answer to anyone!
The G.O.A.T., Oklahoma City - Nov 6, 2009 at 9:57 am
Just where the heck are the repesentives you elected at. Afracia on a jesus trip maybee thats what they tell you they hide until election time. You dont hear of them making good policy for Oklahoman's all you hear about is getting married or jesus trips to afracia or middlemen for 2 million doller payoffs to cheating spouces Its a joke the repulicans win on abortion issues then you let them get way with murder Inhoffe came into are church and spoke on abortion and im heaing all the cheers and wondering how many of these ladys are on the pill its a joke
jeff, del city - Nov 6, 2009 at 9:33 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore jeff
Thank you George W Bush. You screwed the economy so bad it's the worst recession since the Great Depression.
--
Milkman, Oklahoma City - Nov 6, 2009 at 9:31 am
In order to get the unempolyment rate back to 5%, you would have to "CREATE" (not save) 250,000 jobs a month - yes that is a month - for the next 5 years. Unfortunately the Democrats do not know how to "create" jobs in the private sector only in the Government sector. The unemployment rate will continue to go higher every month from now untill 2010 or 2012. The Democrats strategy of Tax and Spend does not work. The bills that are in Washington now, such as, Cap and Trade and Health care are job killers and not job creators. 10.2% should be a very loud alarm for the Democrats, such as, Pelosi Reid, and Obama to suspend these bills and work to fix the ecomony and the unemployment rate. Do you think they will? My opinion is no they will not. God help us!
Sooners Win, Norman - Nov 6, 2009 at 9:29 am
Brock, actually, Obama did not carry a single county in OK, so WE (Oklahomans) didn't elect him. Primarily, the liberal East and West coasts elected our Pres and intelligent thinking people are scared of what's happening, i.e. $10 trillion national debt and rising, a falling dollar, rising oil/gasoline, and inflation on the horizon. Anyone who's ever had a SINGLE class in economics understands what happens when you recklessly increase the money supply with no restraint. If you didn't know, now you do...it's all over the news.
Byron, Norman - Nov 6, 2009 at 9:15 am
Jeff, quit being an apologist for Obamas radical agenda. He was the one that said the stimulus(stealing of wealth) would stop unemployment at 8% yet he did nothing with the money and is holding most of it for next year. Point is, this is going just as he planned.

This 10.2 doesn't count those that have only found part time jobs or those that have quit looking all together and those that have also gone off the governments dole because of the set time frame. The numbers are actually somewhere in the 16%-17% area. People are not hiring because of fear that the government overthrow of our health care industry will cause higher taxation, the Cap and Trade legislation that the radical leftist Democrats want to pass will also cause higher taxation. As well, this government control will most definately cause less liberty, less freedom and will end up being a bureaucracy that is typically inept in the fashion that our government is well known for.

Todays higher unemployment is a direct reflection on Obama. America realizes that his policys will mean less for those that do for themselves. We as the electorate are to blame as well as the willing accomplices in the press. Obama and his cohorts have been on record for saying they wanted to do these things, however, we were blind and stuck our head in the sand and elected him and his radical socialist ideas anyway.
Brock, Beaver - Nov 6, 2009 at 8:50 am
and the jeff hangover continues, still dreaming about the great obamba.
Gary, Oklahoma City - Nov 6, 2009 at 8:30 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Gary
obama just didnt get enough money to get the job market going again. they should have given him the whole budget to give away. then the entire country of mexico would be here.
Gary, Oklahoma City - Nov 6, 2009 at 8:28 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Gary
And the Bush hangover continues...

If you think Obama did this much damage in 9 months you are delusional.
Jeff, Pauls Valley - Nov 6, 2009 at 8:15 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Jeff
Nice changes you made there, Obama.
c, Oklahoma City - Nov 6, 2009 at 8:00 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore c

    News Photo Galleriesview all