SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — An anti-Wi-Fi activist who claims that his neighbor's wireless service has caused him physical harm "cannot reliably detect" the electromagnetic stimuli that he says is hurting him, a Santa Fe judge recently ruled.
The Albuquerque Journal reports (http://bit.ly/Q2bjU8) that District Judge Sarah Singleton recently ruled Arthur Firstenberg "cannot discern or discriminate the effects of anxiety caused by" wireless signals.
Singleton in a recent order also took Firstenberg to task for failing to comply with her orders to work with a court-appointed expert on protocols for testing his purported sensitivity to wireless signals, despite her "repeated admonitions."
However, Singleton did rule that Firstenberg can still try to prove damages for injuries or pain and suffering.
Firstenberg filed suit in January 2010 seeking monetary damages from his neighbor Raphaela Monribot and her landlord Robin Leith. A victory for him could have a huge impact on the electronics business and consumers of Wi-Fi devices in Santa Fe.
But because Firstenberg won't cooperate with the judge's expert or the defendants on "blind testing" to determine whether he can tell or is affected when electronics are turned off or on, Singleton ruled that at trial he cannot submit as evidence any testing from his own experts that purports to show symptoms from his exposure to electromagnetic fields.