Share “Sooner Tea Party leader found guilty of...”

Sooner Tea Party leader found guilty of blackmailing Oklahoma state senator

Jurors in Oklahoma chose no prison time for Sooner Tea Party leader Al Gerhart and only a $1,000 fine.
by Nolan Clay Modified: May 7, 2014 at 10:12 pm •  Published: May 7, 2014

Sooner Tea Party leader Al Gerhart was found guilty Wednesday night of blackmailing a state senator.

Gerhart, an Oklahoma City carpenter, did not get any prison time. Jurors decided a $1,000 fine should be the only punishment for the felony offense.

“The jury held him accountable,” prosecutor Scott Rowland said afterward. “They obviously worked very hard to make the punishment fit the crime. I think they got it right. ... I suspect the jury believes this will be an appropriate deterrent to him and others.”

Gerhart was convicted of blackmail for sending Sen. Cliff Branan an email last year demanding passage of a bill in a Senate committee.

Gerhart also was found guilty of violating the Oklahoma Computer Crimes Act for using a computer to accomplish the blackmail. Jurors chose no fine and no prison time on the second felony offense.

Gerhart, 55, faced up to 10 years in prison and $15,000 in fines on the two felonies. He turned down a plea deal before trial that would have given him unsupervised probation for a year and no felony convictions.

A dejected Gerhart said the verdicts against him “just chills free speech.”

“Who is going to want to risk holding a politician accountable at this point?” he said. “I lost a thousand dollars. I became a felon. I lost my voting rights. I lost my gun rights. I’m probably getting off easy compared to the rest of society, though.”

He said he will appeal.

The jury of eight women and four men deliberated almost eight hours Wednesday at the Oklahoma County Courthouse.

“This is crazy,” defense attorney Kevin Adams told jurors in closing arguments Wednesday morning. “This is what we do in America. We have the right to free speech.”

The attorney told jurors the case has lots of implications for every citizen’s rights.

Rowland, the first assistant district attorney, countered that freedom of speech does not protect blackmail.

“He tried to hijack the political process. He tried to cheat,” the prosecutor said in his closing arguments. “It corrupts the process. That’s why this case is important.”

Continue reading this story on the...

by Nolan Clay
Sr. Reporter
Nolan Clay was born in Oklahoma and has worked as a reporter for The Oklahoman since 1985. He covered the Oklahoma City bombing trials and witnessed bomber Tim McVeigh's execution. His investigative reports have brought down public officials,...
+ show more


Trending Now


AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    Cops Can Force You To Unlock Phone With Apple Touch ID, Judge Rules
  2. 2
    Arizona School Board Votes To Get Rid Of Textbook Pages That Discuss Abortion
  3. 3
    Stillwater near-beheading suspect has family history of homicide
  4. 4
    Rubik's Cube, Ninja Turtles up for Toy Hall of Fame
  5. 5
    Stylish smog masks hit the runways
+ show more