Layden case deferred for a year

Published on NewsOK Modified: January 28, 2013 at 1:47 pm •  Published: January 28, 2013
Advertisement
;

“In May, 2010, I learned there was a Multicounty Grand Jury investigation of the District 18 Drug Court, and there would also be an audit in order to determine if there had been a misappropriation of funds by Ms. Marcum,” Layden said in the affidavit.

“I was unduly trusting of Ms. Marcum at this time and believed she had been unjustly accused,” Layden said. “I then took actions I should not have taken, and which cold have had the effect of hampering the OSBI and the Multicounty Grand Jury,” Layden said in the affidavit.

“Specifically, I asked Assistant District Attorney Mike Miller to interview drug court participants based upon statements made by Angie Marcum alleging certain drug court participants might be responsible for missing funds and an alleged missing receipt book,” Layden alleged in the signed affidavit.

“At the time, I was unaware drug court participants were not being provided sequentially numbered state issued receipts for payments they were making and on many occasions were being provided “sticky notes” that were never properly documented,” Layden continued.

“If I had been aware of these facts I would never have asked Mike Miller to make any inquiry of drug court participants whatsoever,” Layden said in the affidavit.

“I now believe I should have taken no action in connection worth the investigation, but should have allowed it to be handled by completely independent agencies,” Layden continued.

“The evidence I have now seen makes me believe the state can prove Ms. Marcum did embezzle funds from the District 18 Drug Court and that she used me in an effort to deflect attention to drug court participants and away from herself,” Layden alleged in the affidavit.

Marcum has pleaded innocent to the charges against her and her attorney has stated her belief that Marcum will be vindicated.