Legislative shortsightedness on water may harm Oklahoma
You might think the ongoing drought would cause lawmakers to carefully consider long-term water needs. Instead, state legislators appear headed in the opposite direction.
NewsOK Related Articles
The Water for 2060 Act passed last year with strong bipartisan support. It included language setting a goal for Oklahoma to consume no more fresh water in 2060 than in 2012. That's only a goal — not a mandate — but state Rep. Paul Wesselhoft, R-Moore, finds it “reckless.” He filed House Bill 1562 to repeal that language. HB 1562 got committee approval with bipartisan support.
When presenting the bill, Wesselhoft declared the water goal is “the kind of language that comes out of the United Nations; it's Agenda 21” — immediately before saying he likes some Agenda 21 goals, just not water objectives. Make of that what you will.
But Wesselhoft also argued the conservation goal signals Oklahoma's water needs won't increase in the next half-century, weakening our position in ongoing legal disputes with Texas. That's nonsense. Conservation efforts indicate officials expect demand to eventually outpace supply, not anticipation of unending surplus.
Voices Photo Galleriesview all
- 12757Oklahoma tornadoes: The 'Big Dog,' the little boy and the hug that triumphs over tragedy
- 10379Oklahoma tornadoes: Cost, custom keep basements scarce
- 9755Finding Addyson – One family's struggle in the Moore tornado
- 9478Oklahoma tornadoes: Plaza Towers Elementary School teacher shoved students into bathroom as wall collapsed
- 6719Miranda Lambert, Reba McEntire, Vince Gill to join Blake Shelton at "Healing in the Heartland" Oklahoma tornado benefit
- 4489Oklahoma tornadoes: Woman meets the military officer who shared the clothes off his back
- 4265Oklahoma tornadoes: Sooners bring back some smiles to Sydney Angle's teammates