Legislative shortsightedness on water may harm Oklahoma

 
The Oklahoman Editorial | Published: February 14, 2013    Comment on this article Leave a comment

You might think the ongoing drought would cause lawmakers to carefully consider long-term water needs. Instead, state legislators appear headed in the opposite direction.

NewsOK Related Articles

The Water for 2060 Act passed last year with strong bipartisan support. It included language setting a goal for Oklahoma to consume no more fresh water in 2060 than in 2012. That's only a goal — not a mandate — but state Rep. Paul Wesselhoft, R-Moore, finds it “reckless.” He filed House Bill 1562 to repeal that language. HB 1562 got committee approval with bipartisan support.

When presenting the bill, Wesselhoft declared the water goal is “the kind of language that comes out of the United Nations; it's Agenda 21” — immediately before saying he likes some Agenda 21 goals, just not water objectives. Make of that what you will.

But Wesselhoft also argued the conservation goal signals Oklahoma's water needs won't increase in the next half-century, weakening our position in ongoing legal disputes with Texas. That's nonsense. Conservation efforts indicate officials expect demand to eventually outpace supply, not anticipation of unending surplus.

Page 1 of 2




If you prefer your thoughts to appear in The Oklahoman's Opinion section, we encourage you to submit a letter to the editor.


Woman is 57 But Looks 25
Mom reveals simple wrinkle secret that has angered doctors...
www.HealthJournalsReview.com
Mortgage Rates Hit 2.50%
White House Program Cuts Up to $1k off Monthly Payments! (2.90% APR)
www.SeeRefinanceRates.com

Voices Photo Galleriesview all