This week, the state Senate easily passed a bill that not only bans embryonic stem cell research, it makes such research a crime. The bill had previously passed the House by a wide margin and needs only the governor’s signature to become law.
Embryonic stem cell research is a touchy issue, and there’s much to debate. One of our chief concerns in this case is whether the Legislature needs to involve itself so deeply in the debate. How far should lawmakers be allowed to go in dictating to scientists and researchers what work they can or can’t pursue?
The attempted ban comes just after President Barack Obama announced he would free up more federal funds for stem cell research, much to the delight of states that have raced to support the research with state and private dollars during the years former President George W. Bush banned federal funding.
Oklahoma wouldn’t be the first state to ban embryonic stem cell research. Five others — North Dakota, South Dakota, Arkansas, Louisiana and Indiana — have bans, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. But Dr. Stephen Prescott, president of the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, thinks the Oklahoma measure would be the broadest and takes a "sledge hammer” to an issue while ignoring alternatives.
Some states have legalized embryonic stem cell research while deciding to ban state funding for that purpose.