Letter to the Community: From Superintendent John Q. Porter
Letter to the Community: From Superintendent John Q. Porter

Published: January 5, 2008

Oklahoma City Superintendent John Porter provided a letter exclusively to The Oklahoman on Saturday that affirms his intent to work to improve the district’s schools.

Advertisement

A story in today’s Oklahoman revealed that the school district hired someone to conduct an investigation of Porter and that his job may now be on the line.

Read Porter’s letter here now and look for more on the story in tomorrow’s paper.

An Open Letter to the Community: From Superintendent John Q. Porter

It was a tremendous honor for me six months ago to come to Oklahoma City to help make the public schools of our great city world class, schools that would make sure our children get a high quality education today so that they will be able to compete in a global economy. I have been so impressed by the parents, teachers, administrators, business, and religious and community leaders who share this vision for change and who have stood with me in this effort. I am convinced that our vision for great schools can become a reality, and it will as long as we all keep the interests of children first.

I am writing this letter for three reasons. The first reason is to reaffirm my pledge to the greater Oklahoma City community to help make our public schools the best in the state and nation. I understand that not everyone will agree with all my decisions all the time, and certainly I will make mistakes along the way. But my intention is to give to other people’s children what I would want for my very own. Given that core motivation, although I may make some mistakes, I will never intentionally do anything to hurt the beautiful students who attend our schools.

My second reason for writing this letter to the community is to tell you about some allegations that will be made against me by the chairman of the Board of Education. The substance of these allegations is false.

On Thursday, Jan. 3, I received, for the first time, these allegations in the form of a report of an investigation that apparently was commissioned by the chairman of the school board. I understand that on Monday, Jan. 7, just four days after I received the report of these allegations, the chairman of the school board intends to call a meeting for the purpose of suspending and then firing me.

I know that the community is as shocked and disappointed by the actions of the school board chairman as I am, but I intend to fight this issue and stay on the job doing what I came here to do: to help improve the education of our children.

One allegation is that I hired a company to put a new reading program in place in the Oklahoma City Public Schools without using the correct bidding process. This allegation is false.

The Wireless Generation reading diagnostic program has been approved for use in schools all over America and all over Oklahoma by both the United States Department of Education and the State Department of Education. And research shows that this program works — it helps children to learn to read better. Anything that helps children learn more is something our school district should provide for our children. That’s what moms and dads expect us to do and it’s what we will do.

Because this successful reading program already was used in some of our public schools, my goal was to make it available to every child in grades Kindergarten through third throughout our school district. And when we made this decision to buy this successful reading program for our children, I understood that we followed the very same selection process used by the Oklahoma State Department of Education.

The second allegation is that I turned in questionable expenditures for reimbursement. I can state strongly and without equivocation that I had no intention of seeking any improper reimbursement for any expenditure.

Typically, when I travel or engage in business on behalf of the school district, I simply collect the receipts of my expenditures and turn them over to the appropriate officials at the school district to sort through and handle according to the policies and procedures that are in place. I never, ever intended to seek reimbursement for any expenses that were not allowed for reimbursement. It’s wrong and I simply would not do it.

A few months ago the school board chairman asked me to resign. I told him, “No!” I am here to serve the children of Oklahoma City and I am going to do my job.

Since then the board chairman has engaged in an effort to undermine my leadership and to make it very difficult to do the job I came here to do for our kids. The board chairman’s comments to me have been belittling, disrespectful and very, very hurtful and disappointing.

I hope that the board chairman and I can put this behind us and get on with the business at hand. I have a great deal of respect for him: he has done a lot for the Oklahoma City Public Schools, giving his time and energy to help children. Working together, we can get this job done.

I came to Oklahoma City six months ago to improve educational opportunities for all of our children. I am still committed to this goal. Change is difficult. Sometimes the adults don’t want to change to a new way of helping children succeed. But that change is necessary. In Oklahoma City, we cannot continue to do things the way they’ve always been done and expect to help our children make strong academic gains. As uncomfortable as it is, we must change as an organization if we are going to create world class schools.

I bring to this job a vision for change that will move Oklahoma City schools from some of the lowest test scores in the state and nation to the highest. I don’t believe that this should take a very long time but it will take an unrelenting focus on improving teaching and learning.

What I know for sure is if we are to give all of our children the best chance for a great education, we can no longer pretend that what we have done in the past is good enough. We must raise the bar for all of our students. We must push our good schools to get better while closing a very serious and persistent achievement gap in some of our poorest performing schools. We must reverse the alarming data that shows our African American and Hispanic students with poor attendance, high drop out and suspension rates and some of the lowest test scores in the state and country. Oklahoma City will never be a great community without public schools that produce an educated citizenry.

Yes, the data is frightening. Yes, change is often uncomfortable for the people who benefit from the status quo. However, I came to Oklahoma to lead a school system that will provide all children with an equal access to a quality education, regardless of their race, ethnicity, religion or economic circumstance.

I am not sure what Monday will bring for me as your superintendent. What I know is that I believe in our children and the teachers, principals and staff who work closely with them every day. I believe that our parents and community members want a better public school system. I believe that if we are able to mobilize all of our resources and focus on putting the children and not the adult issues first, we can reform our schools and improve achievement for all.

I once heard that when the elders in some African countries would visit the villages, they would ask one simple question. The question: “How are the children?” Only if all of the children were well would the village be considered well. In Oklahoma City, not all of our children are doing well in our schools. However, I am confident that this can change. If we, as the adults entrusted with their care and academic well-being, “put the children first.”


Toolbar sponsored by: David Stanley Ford
Bookmark and Share



Your thoughts!

Thank you for joining our conversations on NewsOK.com. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.

Editor's note: It is not our intent to offer comments on local crime or fatality stories.

Leave a comment

Log in below or sign up (it's free).





Because he is a fraud.
Neal, Oklahoma City - Jan 9, 2008 at 5:52 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Neal
Why is Dr. before his name so agonizing to anyone. Stay focused and stop finding things reasons to be angry.
DENISE, Oklahoma City - Jan 8, 2008 at 10:09 pm
He has a bachelor of arts degree and a juris doctorate. The juris doctorate degree is a (ahem) law degree. 3 year degree. But his resume shows no sign of a license. Most attorneys do not require the public to call them "Dr.". That is so funny. Wonder why nobody saw that as a red flag a long time ago.
JustaGirl, Oklahoma City - Jan 8, 2008 at 12:17 pm
Enough is enough. If the school board votes to suspend John Porter with the intent of firing him in the near future then I think it's time to recall our board representatives. They do not serve my interests. The board has faltered in their job for years. If they cannot work with the man they so ceremoniously hired 6 months ago, a man with more experience and better credentialed than any board member, then it's time for a new board. Let's vote the bums out.
Andy, Oklahoma City - Jan 7, 2008 at 12:43 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Andy
To quote j, whose comment is below: "Having a parent that taught in one of the worst high schools in the district and hearing about the disfunction that was present prior to Dr Porter's arrival it is not surprising that his shake up has ruffled some feathers." Having had some experience in OKCPS and in dealing with the administration, I agree with j 100%. Dr. Porter came in with a vision very different from past administrators and from that of the current board. At every turn, when he has tried to implement change, the board has tried to stymie him. I believe that Mr. Hudson and company are trying to remove Dr. Porter, not because of impropriety but because of philosophical differences. I, for one, stand firmly behind Dr. Porter and his vision for Oklahoma City Public Schools and its students. Stand firm, Dr. Porter!!!
Robert, Moore - Jan 6, 2008 at 3:55 pm
I do not think that the issue is with how the district is run, but how Mr. Porter conducts business. Inappropriate use of funds, not following board policy, unprofessional treatment of fellow employees, and overall lack of consistancy. By airing the district's dirty laundry while ignoring the board's requests to meet, I think we can see how this man conducts business.
Neal, Oklahoma City - Jan 6, 2008 at 3:11 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Neal
Anyone recall how Hudson became chairman of the OKCPS board of education? Recall this very newspaper writing about him being the "ONLY" one to file for the job. Why was that? Basically, this very paper talked about how Kirk Humphrey so badly wanted the MAPS program vote to pass that HE selected Hudson "because no one had the money to run against him and he would bring credibility to the financially troubled district." Well, MAPS passed, Hudson became Chairman, but do we really need that fifth wheel now? The MAPS committee is operating just fine, so is Hudson still needed? I will leave that for the public to decide, and since no one has challenged Hudson in 2004, he continues to be chairman, but again, is the position really needed? What constituency does Hudson represent? Moreover, I have no idea what Mr. Porter is accused of, but perhaps one thing is dramatically coming to light. That is, a school board should consist of elected individuals who REPRESENT a specific constituency. In addition, once hired, a superintendent is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the district. A school board member's responsibility is to make policies and LISTEN to their constituency. Their job is not the day-to-day operation of the district. A superintendent is paid, and paid well to do that job. At this point, it looks as though the OKCPS district has a CEO trying to run the district and a Superintendent having to work around the CEO to get his job done, which is to run the operation of the district. As far as getting a bad return on surveys of principals, well perhaps in Mr. Porter's thinking, if you always do what you have always done, you are going to get what you always get. Take the new John Marshall, Mr. Porter came in cleaned house and you haven't heard a bad thing about John Marshall since then.
Terri, Oklahoma City - Jan 6, 2008 at 10:06 am
I had the opportunity to meet and talk with Dr Porter and he was honest and frank about the poor state of the OKC school system. He was also energetic and enthusiastic about the potential of the children and how the system could be rebuilt. Having a parent that taught in one of the worst high schools in the district and hearing about the disfunction that was present prior to Dr Porter's arrival it is not surprising that his shake up has ruffled some feathers. Its not about the board, or the administrators, its about the kids. Sounds like the School Board needs to quit micro managing and start supporting. But then we the average citizens all know that this is a good ole boy system......need I say more?
j, OKC - Jan 6, 2008 at 10:03 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore j
J.D. is a much shorter course that a Ph.D.! 2 years versus 4 to 6 years for Ph.D.
Desiderius, Tuttle - Jan 6, 2008 at 9:40 am
Like you said, "While it is not nearly as common for attorneys to be addressed as "Doctor" as other terminal-degree holders, it is not that uncommon in the educational field." Mr. Porter's degree is not in an educational field.
Neal, Oklahoma City - Jan 5, 2008 at 11:23 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Neal
A Juris Doctor degree (that of a law school graduate) is no less a degree than that of a Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) or a Doctor of Medicine (M.D.). While it is not nearly as common for attorneys to be addressed as "Doctor" as other terminal-degree holders, it is not that uncommon in the educational field.
Joe, Bugtussle - Jan 5, 2008 at 10:51 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Joe
A little clarification: the Juris Doctor is not a terminal degree in terms of academic research degrees, and rarely, are its holders acknowledged with the title of "doctor".
Neal, Oklahoma City - Jan 5, 2008 at 10:46 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Neal
He is not a doctor. He is also not an educator. His experience in education is as a board member, not in a school as a teacher or an administrator.
Neal, Oklahoma City - Jan 5, 2008 at 10:23 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Neal
One thing that is bugging me: John Porter's profile on the web says "Dr. John Q. Porter" but shows his only degrees are a B.A. and J.D. While a J.D. (law degree) is a doctoral degree, we don't call lawyers "doctors". Is the profile missing another degree, or is the profile misleading people into thinking he's "Dr."?
LW, Oklahoma City - Jan 5, 2008 at 9:50 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore LW
Race is not the issue. It is credibility. Mr. Porter lacks credibility among the professional educators and administrators in the district. Although he says in his letter, "We must push our good schools to get better", his policies have only inhibited or dismantled successful programs.
Neal, Oklahoma City - Jan 5, 2008 at 7:52 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Neal
Cliff Hudson is an incredibly talented and strong leader. He is going to have to tell the public why he has lost confidence in Porter so quickly - after all, surely he had more influence than anyone on hiring Porter in the first place. What Porter says is 100% right - OKCPS needs some deep, painful changes to ever become more than the dangerous joke it is. And what Porter has written in this letter is exactly the same thing he has said from the day he got here - he is definitely consistent. But there is definitely a chance he's just saying this stuff and doing something different.
c, Oklahoma City - Jan 5, 2008 at 7:52 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore c
LW, I really don't think this is a racial issue either. Cliff Hudson is a great community leader and has done a lot for OKC, but sometimes a high-powered executive meets another high-powered executive and the sparks will fly. I think Mr. Porter should be given more of a chance to prove himself.
Margaret, Holdenville - Jan 5, 2008 at 7:17 pm
The mere fact that Mr. Porter did not play the "race card" suggests to me that the comments in letter are legitimate. Anytime someone doesn't throw the race card down at the first sign of criticism, their credibility is automatically enhanced.
LW, Oklahoma City - Jan 5, 2008 at 6:51 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore LW
I not sure what is going with the Oklahoma City public school system. I thought there was some smoke when all the people that came with Dr. Porter all resigned after being her a couple of weeks.If Oklahoma City public schools fire Dr. Porter, it will look like a joke. It will even harder to fine somebody to take the job. Nation wide source and the guy only lasts 6 months.
david, edmond - Jan 5, 2008 at 6:49 pm