Liberals’ overwrought and dishonest concerns over ‘dark money’

The Oklahoman Editorial Modified: November 7, 2013 at 5:57 am •  Published: November 7, 2013

WHEN the American Civil Liberties Union defends the rights of pedophiles to discuss child-molesting strategies, some liberals will loudly defend the ACLU for its supposed commitment to constitutionally protected free speech. But when political conservatives spend money to oppose liberal goals, everything changes.

In 2000, the ACLU defended the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) when the parents of Jeffrey Curley, a 10-year-old Massachusetts boy, filed a wrongful-death lawsuit seeking damages from the group for the 1997 rape and murder of their son. One of the boy’s killers had accessed NAMBLA literature discussing how to attain children’s trust, gain access to children and avoid the police.

The ACLU argued the lawsuit was designed to stifle the dissemination of NAMBLA’s unpopular beliefs. Citing U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 1960s that protected the NAACP’s civil rights activities in the South, ACLU attorneys vowed to block any effort to force public release of NAMBLA’s membership lists. The ACLU succeeded in getting the lawsuit dismissed.

Contrast that with the California Fair Political Practices Commission’s recent targeting (and fining) of conservative groups.

Americans for Responsible Leadership, based in Arizona, donated millions to the Small Business Action Committee, an organization opposing a California tax increase initiative and supporting a measure to reduce labor unions’ ability to collect dues for political activity. After initially balking, Americans for Responsible Leadership revealed its contribution came from the Center to Protect Patient Rights, which opposed Obamacare. The Center to Protect Patient Rights had previously gotten money from Freedom Partners, which has been financially supported by Charles and David Koch, two businessmen brothers active in free-market causes. Thus, liberals saw a scheme to hide the Koch brothers’ participation.

Left unsaid was that the nonprofit groups are not legally required to identify individual donors. And never mind that the Koch brothers deny any involvement in the California initiatives. A Freedom Partners spokesman said the group didn’t provide support to anyone directly involved in the California propositions.

| |


Trending Now


  1. 1
    Miley Cyrus hospitalized, cancels Kansas City concert
  2. 2
    Barresi opposes bill to cut state testing in social studies
  3. 3
    Oklahoma basketball: Guard Je'lon Hornbeak to transfer
  4. 4
    Man re-arrested in Pakistan for cannibalism
  5. 5
    Report: Joe Buck, Greg Norman to lead Fox Sports' golf coverage in 2015
+ show more