Loan firm leaders say credit crisis worst to come

By Don Mecoy
Published: September 14, 2008

The leaders of an Oklahoma City company that markets huge portfolios of bank loans saw the subprime mortgage crisis coming.

Advertisement

And now they perceive more misery.

How bad is the current credit crisis going to get?

"You don't want to know,” said Bliss Morris, chief executive officer of First Financial Network. "It's a tidal wave.”

First Financial Network, based in Oklahoma City, is the nation's leading loan sale advisory firm. The company has marketed more than $16 billion in loans and assets over the past 19 years.

Bliss Morris' husband, First Financial Chief Operating Officer John Morris, estimates the financial sector will see another two years of a widening credit crisis.

"We think it's going to be bigger than the S&L crisis in terms of dollars, not in terms of banks (failing),” John Morris said.

Banks and large financial institutions have been hit hard, and the Morrises expect hedge funds will be next. The ability to securitize pools of loans has dried up, which has forced lenders to carry the risk of the loans they originate or cut back on lending, Bliss Morris said.

The government takeover of the nation's two main mortgage finance firms, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the Federal Reserve's employment of sharp rate cuts and rarely used lending tools were stark demonstrations of the current mess.

Keith Geary, chief executive officer of Capital West Securities in Oklahoma City, expects scores of banks will fail in the coming months, although he thinks Oklahoma banks should be spared.

"I won't be surprised in the next 12 months if we don't have 200 banks across the U.S. fail,” Geary said. "That's about $75 billion in assets.”

‘Throwing gasoline on the fire'
Last week's decision by a Warren Buffett-owned firm to stop issuing insurance to banks on large deposits that exceed the $100,000 of coverage by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was an important signal, Geary said.

"Buffett could have done a lot of damage to a lot of banks, some of it deservedly so; some not so much,” Geary said. "That's throwing gasoline on the fire.”

While the turmoil is unsettling for Oklahoma bank customers, Geary said state banks generally are safe although they will pay for some of the losses guaranteed by the FDIC.

"People should feel safe about their banks here in Oklahoma,” he said.

Meanwhile, some large institutions like Lehman Brothers Holdings and Washington Mutual are struggling to stay afloat.

"The financial sector still has a way to go before it hits bottom,” Geary said. "No one in the marketplace has a sense that we're there.”

Jeff Blumenthal, vice president of investments at Wachovia Securities in Oklahoma City, said he also thinks the financial sector will struggle in the near term.

"Be prepared for more bad news and more scary news, because I do think there will be more bad news,” he said.

Bank losses compared to dot-coms
But these tough times can offer opportunities for investors, Blumenthal said. The huge losses inflicted on the stocks of some well-capitalized financial institutions are as overblown as some of the massive gains that dot-com firms recorded in 1999 and 2000, Blumenthal said.

"Back then it was easy for people to make investments when it did not make sense at all,” he said. "Now it is so difficult for people to make investments in the financial sector when it makes sense.”


Toolbar sponsored by: David Stanley Ford
Bookmark and Share



Comments

Thank you for joining our conversations on NewsOK.com. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.

Editor's note: It is not our intent to offer comments on crime or fatality stories.

Leave a comment. Log in below or sign up (it's free).

   
...and lets not forget McCain's part in that savings and loan scandal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five
Kevin, Oklahoma City - Sep 16, 2008 9:47 AM
Report as inappropriate
It would appear brother Jeb was involved in this scandal as well...http://www.campaignwatch.org/more1.htm
Kevin, Oklahoma City - Sep 15, 2008 10:02 PM
Report as inappropriate
So the FDIC didn't cover any losses? What happened to the billion or so dollars Neil Bush gained a felony conviction over? Disappeared? Prosperity to whom? The upper five percent, as usual with rethuglicans? Are you speaking of the industry that Reagan policies encouraged to move to other countries? If you think I'm socialist because I am of working class, then you must favor facism, being a Gaylord mafia lap dog and apparently being strongly in favor of corporate welfare.
Kevin, Oklahoma City - Sep 15, 2008 10:17 AM
Report as inappropriate
You are so incredibly ignornant, Kevin. Do you practice at being so uninformed? No one bailed out the S&Ls - that's why they rightfully failed. The problem has been from the beginning all the Jesse Jacksons running around accusing banks of "racial profiling" when they loan money. Eventually, all the lending decisions were handed over to computers (ie instant credit) who basically didn't care about *ability* to pay or *history* of paying because YOU and YOUR SOCIALIST buddies wanted the government to pay for everyone. If it wasn't for the propserity and common sense Reagan brought to our country, we never would have had the industry and income to pay off all those bad loans (and today's bad loans).
c, Oklahoma City - Sep 15, 2008 7:26 AM
Report as inappropriate
"We think it's going to be bigger than the S&L crisis in terms of dollars, not in terms of banks (failing),” John Morris said. Wasn't that from the Reagan/Bush era? Do all Bushes and/or republicans like to bail out finacial institutions with taxpayer dollars for making questionable loans? Is that their 'vision' of pumping more money into the economy to prop up their failed economic policies and tax cuts largely benifitting the wealthy?
Kevin, Oklahoma City - Sep 14, 2008 4:47 PM
Report as inappropriate