Mixing science, politics can result in bad policy

 
The Oklahoman Editorial | Published: November 28, 2012    Comment on this article Leave a comment

Advertisement

Even if mankind is to blame for climate change, there's little reason to think a U.S. carbon tax or cap-and-trade system would have meaningful impact. Past analysis has shown unilateral U.S. action on carbon dioxide emissions would largely be offset by international production. If the United States wants to commit economic suicide in the name of environmentalism, the Chinese don't seem eager to join us.

Furthermore, scientific evidence for global warming remains muddled at best. The United Kingdom-based Daily Mail recently noted data compiled from more than 3,000 measuring points on land and sea showed the world stopped getting warmer nearly 16 years ago. Before that, temperatures rose from 1980 to 1996, but had been stable or declined for the 40 years prior to that period. Some scientists believe those temperature changes are a product of natural variability and non-manmade causes. Definitive proof remains elusive for all sides.

Those who claim science is “settled” don't understand science. In 1854, cholera was tied to contaminated water. It took nearly 30 years before that explanation was accepted over theories blaming bad vapors for outbreaks.

When politics taints science more than science improves and informs policy, the results can be distressing. Should we wipe out countless jobs and increase economic hardship for families in the name of global warming theories that could ultimately prove no more valid than the cholera-vapors link?

Page 2 of 2




If you prefer your thoughts to appear in The Oklahoman's Opinion section, we encourage you to submit a letter to the editor.


(5) Fibromyalgia Signs
These (5) Signs of Fibromyalgia Often Get Missed. Learn More Now.
myadvicefinder.com
5 foods you must not eat
Cut down a bit of stomach fat every day by never eating these 5 foods
Trimdownclub.com

Voices Photo Galleriesview all