Montana's free-roaming bison plan in judge's hands

Associated Press Modified: November 5, 2012 at 7:16 pm •  Published: November 5, 2012
Advertisement
;

Plaintiffs in the case also said there should have been more environmental studies done on the potential for brucellosis exposures and other problems before the free-roaming policy was adopted in April 2011. That formal adoption came after hundreds of bison already had been allowed into the basin.

Scientists and state officials have said that another wild animal, elk, are the biggest threat for the spread of brucellosis because they are more numerous and their movements are unrestricted.

Three conservation groups — Bear Creek Council, Greater Yellowstone Coalition and Natural Resources Defense Council — have intervened in the case on the side of the state. Their attorney, Tim Preso, said Monday that the ranchers and others opposed to bison in the basin do not speak for all of its residents.

"They don't represent the larger group of people in the Gardiner Basin that moved there to be closer to wildlife," he said. "If we can't conserve bison on the boundary of Yellowstone National Park, where we saved them from extinction, where can we do it?"

Most bison stayed inside Yellowstone last winter due to relatively mild conditions. Thousands have flooded out in other years.

The most recent count of the park's bison herd tallied 4,320 animals — enough to trigger a major migration this winter if conditions are right.



Trending Now


AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    U.S. leads in number of people who think climate change is no big deal
  2. 2
    Texas Abortion Rate Drops Dramatically As Women Seek Other Options
  3. 3
    The Truth About Living Together Before Marriage
  4. 4
    Former OU swingman Cameron Clark agrees to terms with Vanoli Basket of Italy
  5. 5
    What kind of laws are you supposed to pass to convince 38 million people to conserve water during...
+ show more