Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford

Myth of ’08 has been demolished

By Charles Krauthammer    Comments Comment on this article4
Published: November 6, 2009

WASHINGTON — Sure, Election Day 2009 will scare moderate Democrats and make passage of Obamacare more difficult. Sure, it makes it easier for resurgent Republicans to raise money and recruit candidates for 2010. But the most important effect of Tuesday’s elections is historical. It demolishes the great realignment myth of 2008.

Advertisement

In the aftermath of last year’s Obama sweep, we heard endlessly about its fundamental, revolutionary, transformational nature. How it was ushering in an FDR-like realignment for the 21st century in which new demographics — most prominently, rising minorities and the young — would bury the GOP far into the future.

This was all ridiculous from the beginning. 2008 was a historical anomaly. A uniquely charismatic candidate was running at a time of deep war weariness, with an intensely unpopular Republican president, against a politically incompetent opponent, amid the greatest financial collapse since the Great Depression. And still he won by only seven points.

Exactly a year later comes the empirical validation of that skepticism. Virginia — presumed harbinger of the new realignment, having gone Democratic in ’08 for the first time in 44 years — went red again. With a vengeance. Barack Obama had carried it by six points. The Republican gubernatorial candidate won by 17 — a 23-point swing. New Jersey went from plus 15 Democratic in 2008 to minus 4 in 2009. A 19-point swing.

What happened? The vaunted Obama realignment vanished. In 2009 in Virginia, the black vote was down by 20 percent; the under-30 vote by 50 percent. And as for independents, the ultimate prize of any realignment, they bolted. In Virginia and New Jersey they’d gone narrowly for Obama in ’08. This year they went Republican by a staggering 33 points in Virginia and 30 points in New Jersey.

White House apologists will say the Virginia Democrat was weak. If the difference between Bob McDonnell and Creigh Deeds was so great, how come when the same two men ran against each other statewide for attorney general four years ago the race was a virtual dead heat? Which made the ’09 McDonnell-Deeds rematch the closest you get in politics to a laboratory experiment for measuring the change in external conditions. Run them against each other again when it’s Obamaism in action and see what happens. What happened was a Republican landslide.

The Obama coattails of 2008 are gone. The expansion of the electorate, the excitement of the young, came in uniquely propitious Democratic circumstances and amid unparalleled enthusiasm for electing the first black president.

A return to the norm
November ’08 was one-shot, one-time, never to be replicated. Nor was November ’09 a realignment. It was a return to the norm — and definitive confirmation that 2008 was one of the great flukes in American political history.

The irony of 2009 is that the anti-Democratic tide overshot the norm — deeply blue New Jersey, for example, elected a Republican governor for the first time in 12 years — because Democrats so thoroughly misread 2008 and the mandate they assumed it bestowed. Obama saw himself as anointed by a watershed victory to remake American life.

Moreover, the same conventional wisdom that proclaimed the dawning of a new age last November dismissed the inevitable popular reaction to Obama’s hubristic expansion of government, taxation, spending and debt as a raging rabble of resentful reactionaries, AstroTurf-phony and Fox News-deranged.

Some rump. Just last month Gallup found that conservatives outnumber liberals by 2 to 1 (40 percent to 20 percent) and even outnumber moderates (at 36 percent). So on Tuesday, the "rump” rebelled. It’s the natural reaction of a center-right country to a governing party seeking to rush through a left-wing agenda using temporary majorities created by the one-shot election of 2008. The misreading of that election — and of the mandate it allegedly bestowed — is the fundamental cause of the Democratic debacle of 2009.

WASHINGTON POST WRITERS GROUP

Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford





Free 2009 Credit Report and All 3 Scores
Free 3-bureau Credit Report – includes Transunion, Equifax, Experian.
FreeCreditReportsInstantly.com

Don't Pay For School - Free Scholarships
Sign Up for Free Scholarship Guide. Millions Are Available For You.
ProgramAdvisor.com/FreeScholarships


Leave a Comment

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online

Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.


Log in below or sign up (it's free).





Bob, I don't make the rules. Jeff set out the rules in his stupid comment. The President is honoring our dead and wounded soldiers at Ft Hood and all Jeff can do is be an ass. He can change the rules whenever he wants. But, I doubt he's smart enough.
--
Milkman, Oklahoma City - Nov 6, 2009 at 8:05 am
Your comments, Milkman, are unfortunately a prime example of how liberals argue. They have nothing to say that makes sense and then must call people stupid names.
Bob, Shattuck - Nov 6, 2009 at 7:57 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bob
Jeff, Oh come on, don't you have something to say about his suit, his uppity manner, how many times he paused. Jeff, is that the best you can do? Go back and look at the video again, surely there's something else wrong. Your post was rather short. OH, you'll have a longer one later after Glenn and fatboy are on so they can tell you what to say.
--stupid hick hillbilly inbred okie
--
Milkman, Oklahoma City - Nov 6, 2009 at 7:46 am
off topic/ what does it say about Obama, when the press conference about the shooting at FT Hood, Obama comes out and gives a shout out to an Indian leader and someone responds yeah yeah. Obama finally after a couple of minutes gets to the shootings. He should have done that first and not even mentioned the meeting. It didn't compare to what had happened. It shows Obama Only cares about Obama and is so wrapped up in himself, he disrespected every family in America. How would you like Obama to speak at your love ones funeral and he gets up there and says I see pete's in the audience hey Pete and theres Johnny, Hey Johnny how you doin, we had a great meeting the other day. Now I would like to talk about the dead guy! All I know had this been Bush people would be screaming, They already lambasted him when he was reading to the schoolkids but On the oTher hand had this been Bush he would have only talked about FT Hood. Maybe I'm wrong and respect went out years ago.
jeff, Harrah - Nov 6, 2009 at 7:36 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore jeff

    News Photo Galleriesview all