No down payment, no mortgage former treasury secretary urges
Comments
0
By The Associated Press
Published: November 1, 2008
Modified: October 31, 2008 at 4:09 pm
Modified: October 31, 2008 at 4:09 pm
LEXINGTON, Ky. — President Bush’s first treasury secretary said Congress should scrap plans for a new economic stimulus package and instead require that no future home mortgage be awarded without a 20 percent down payment.
Advertisement
No desire to serve
O’Neill, who hasn’t endorsed a candidate in the race and said he wouldn’t be interested in serving in either administration, made a personal pitch last month to Democratic nominee Barack Obama concerning his idea to mandate down payments. He declined to characterize Obama’s response. O’Neill, a former chief executive of aluminum giant Alcoa Inc., served as treasury secretary for the first two years of Bush’s presidency, including leading the financial response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. While he praised aspects of the recent $700 billion financial bailout, which he said has allowed world markets to take a "deep breath,” O’Neill said there should have been government action to combat faulty home loans far earlier. In 2006, he said, 30 percent of mortgages had no down payment and a larger number of those buyers defaulted on their first payment. "That was a strong enough signal we should have shut down this ... flagrant abuse of the principles of home finance,” O’Neill said. "It was bound to crater. It was absolutely bound to come down around our ears, which it has.”Protection for system
If every mortgage were backed by a 20 percent down payment, O’Neill said, the financial system would be protected long-term, even if some individual investments or businesses failed. "If you can’t afford a home mortgage, we shouldn’t give you one,” he said. O’Neill said he is disappointed that the political response from both parties includes wide support for another economic stimulus package rather than curbing additional bad mortgages. He estimated that only 20 percent of the money pumped into the last stimulus package actually stimulated the economy, with the rest being used to pay off bills or going into savings accounts. Should there be another one, he fears much of it will be bogged down by pet projects from lawmakers. "In a way it’s a dangerous time because every politician can imagine some additional money that they could put into a package that they believe will help them get re-elected,” O’Neill said. "It’s like a feeding frenzy when it looks like they’re going to have more stimulus programs. It’s almost as though there’s no connection and understanding that at the end of the day, we the American people are going to have to pay for this.”
Related Topics:
Public Finance, Politics, U.S. Politics, Business, Elections and Voting, Economic Policy, Home Financing, Consumer Credit and Debt, National Economy, U.S. Presidential Election, U.S. National Economy

Prev

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online
Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.
Log in below or sign up (it's free).