No verdict yet in Fort Hood shooting trial

Published on NewsOK Modified: August 22, 2013 at 6:22 pm •  Published: August 22, 2013
Advertisement
;

FORT HOOD, Texas (AP) — The Army psychiatrist on trial for the 2009 shooting rampage at Fort Hood passed on his final chance to address jurors before they started deliberating Thursday, even after prosecutors insisted they hand down a verdict that would allow the death penalty.

Maj. Nidal Hasan is acting as his own attorney but declined to plead his case after prosecutors finished their closing argument. When the judge told Hasan he could begin, he said: "The defense chooses not to make a closing statement."

Army psychiatrist is facing numerous counts of premeditated murder and attempted premeditated murder for the attack, which killed 13 people and wounded more than 30 others at the sprawling Army post in central Texas on Nov. 5, 2009.

It was the deadliest mass shooting ever on a U.S. military base.

Prosecutors laid out a detailed roadmap of their case during their closing argument, saying there was no question that Hasan planned and carried out the attack.

"The facts I laid out to you give you only one option," the prosecutor, Col. Steve Henricks, told jurors. "The accused without a doubt — without any doubt at all — had a premeditated design to kill."

Jurors began deliberating Thursday afternoon. After about three hours, they asked the judge if they could review the testimony of the Fort Hood police officer who ended the rampage by shooting the gunman.

The judge agreed but then allowed jurors to leave for the evening. Deliberations are scheduled to resume Friday morning.

During his brief opening statement two weeks ago, Hasan told jurors that evidence would "clearly show" he was the shooter. He also described himself as a soldier who had "switched sides."

But since then, he has sat mostly silent in his wheelchair. Hasan, who was paralyzed after he was shot during the attack, has raised few objections during the 13-day trial. He questioned only three of the nearly 90 witnesses called by prosecutors, and the only piece of evidence he submitted was an evaluation from his boss that called him a good soldier.

On Thursday, military prosecutors asked jurors for a unanimous conviction on the premeditated murder charges, which would allow them to seek the death penalty — the government's priority in the case.