Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford

Oklahoma City-based Feed The Children charity owns Burbank home
Watchdog group says $1.2M home to lure celebrities may get Feed The Children in tax trouble

Nolan Clay    Comments Comment on this article94
Published: July 19, 2009
Modified: July 20, 2009 at 5:11 pm

© Copyright 2009,

The Oklahoman

A charity known for its heart-wrenching appeals for funds to feed starving children spent $1.2 million in donations on a house a few miles from Hollywood, an investigation by The Oklahoman found.

Multimedia

NewsOK Related Articles

Feed The Children, an Oklahoma City-based Christian relief organization, bought the new four-bedroom house in Burbank, Calif., in May 2007, records show. The daughter of the charity’s president then moved in, records show.

The daughter, Larri Sue Jones, 43, told police after a December break-in that Feed The Children owns the house but "since her parents founded the organization, she was given the residence to live in,” according to a police report.

The home’s existence came to light during the legal fight for control of the charity, which reports raising more than $1 billion in cash and gifts a year. The charity says it supplements more than 760,000 meals a day.

Feed The Children President Larry Jones said the house was bought "to start an operation on the West Coast to reach out to celebrities.” He called it a combination residence and office.

"I have no regrets,” Larry Jones said in a statement given to The Oklahoman before he left on a trip to Africa.

"The relationship forged with several celebrities who embrace our mission at Feed The Children has made it possible to feed more children,” he wrote. "Celebrities open doors for us to raise in-kind and monetary gifts.”

Larry Jones said his daughter "lived and worked out of the house as intended.”

‘It’s not necessary’
The daughter is a vice president and an attorney for the charity. She has been at odds with her father during the legal fight.

"It was much more economical and, frankly, a better use of funds to buy a house than try to rent or buy an office as well as a house,” Larry Jones said.

He said the home was bought "from funds we raised to help expand the reach and opportunity of our ministry.”

A critic of the charity, Daniel Borochoff, president of the American Institute of Philanthropy, said the charity could get in serious trouble with the Internal Revenue Service for buying the home.

"It is a ridiculous use of charitable money. ... It’s not necessary. ... It’s an outrage that this kind of thing should be going on,” Borochoff said.

The house’s value has dropped below $1 million, records show.

"Like everyone else, I am disappointed in the collapse of the real estate market in California and other places,” Larry Jones said. "We intended to sell the home at some point for a sizeable profit and then buy a small office to house our West Coast operations. With that said, we know if we stay focused on our mission, the Lord will take care of everything else.”

He said Feed The Children’s board approved the home purchase after much consideration.

"We prayerfully considered this decision and, after doing so, we were at peace with it,” he said.

Celebrities involved with the charity include actors Dean Cain, Roger Moore, Shannon Elizabeth, Lou Gossett Jr. and Amy Brenneman.

Currently in Africa on behalf of Feed The Children are talk show host Montel Williams; "General Hospital” stars Anthony Geary and Kelly Monaco; "All My Children” actress Susan Lucci; and actors Erik Estrada, Christopher Massey of Nickelodeon’s "Zoey 101,” Kyle Massey of Disney’s "Cory in the House;” and Devon Werkheiser of Nickelodeon’s "Ned’s Declassified School Survival Guide,” the charity said Friday.

About the battle
The ongoing legal battle pits Larry Jones against the majority of Feed the Children’s board.

The directors upset with Larry Jones complain his "freewheeling dominance” of decisions has hurt the charity.

They were preparing to force him to take a sabbatical, but in December he had them ousted from the board before they could act. A new board then fired key executives, including Jones’ daughter, who sided with the upset directors.

A judge later undid those changes — at least temporarily. Oklahoma County District Judge Patricia Parrish reinstated ousted directors and gave Larri Sue Jones and other executives their jobs back. The next hearing in the dispute is set for Aug. 14.

Larri Sue Jones could not be reached for comment. Her attorney declined comment.

She also owns, through a trust, a residence in Oklahoma City, records show.

The median price of a house in Burbank in 2007 was about $625,000, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. The median value of an Oklahoma house that year was about $95,000.

Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford




Obama Urges Homeowners to Refinance
($180,000 Refinance under $939/mo) See Rates - No Credit Check Req.
www.LowerMyBills.com

Refinance and Save $1,000's
$200K Mortgage for $917/month. No Obligation. Refinance Requests Only.
www.pickAmortgage.com


Leave a Comment

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online

Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.


Log in below or sign up (it's free).





News from Mr. Clay that the lawsuit has been settled is good. Unfortunately, FTC can't live with Larry Jones and can't live without him. The announced settlement will place FTC under solid management and Larry will continue to JUST be FTC's spokesman and fundraiser. BTW-Larry is incredible in this area. A reasonable compromise and I hope it succeeds. As for Larry, Frances, Larri Sue and Allen I sincerely hope their family can pull back together and let bygones be bygones.
Bill, denver - Aug 13, 2009 at 11:09 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
Vivian-really good questions. 1st-I often said they are NOT evil folks and they, their employees and donors have done much good. But, as you can see from the board minutes, other article, non-profit "watch-dog" organizations etc. the donors are being mislead and the needy are not being served efficiently or effectively. 2nd-my motive is just to make sure this situation does not become invisible to the donors and the public as has happened many times in past years yet nothing was ever done to change FTC's misrepresentation of who they are and what they "really" do. 3rd-I have supported FTC in the past without knowing all the facts so I wanted to make sure I "looked before I leaped" again thus reading all I could find. 4th-Whether it be politicians, financial firms or any other group receiving from or serving the public I sincerely believe management "accountability" is critical. Frankly, if I had the power/control over FTC as Larry does I would likely followed the same path so I'm no better than him. BUT-the problems he has brought upon himself, his wife, his children and Feed The Children are VERY real and damaging not only to FTC etc. but to the entire non-profit world. When public confidence wanes in this segment of our economy it's the truly needy among us who suffer. There are many very good humanitarian organizations in this and other countries who will/are going to see their donations suffer from the fallout of the Feed The Children errant ways, particularly in the current economic climate. I am guilty of, at times, saying things that are "not very nice" when I'm upset I admit and I am trying to "calm down" before I post.
Bill, denver - Jul 29, 2009 at 3:36 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
Bill,

If you know the Jones', and know they are good people, why are you consistently posting things in a manner to insist they are corrupt? What is your motivation for these posts? Do you feel it is your job to hold them accountable for their actions or to "expose" them to others? You stated you have read through ALL the documents. Why? Why are you so concerned with this issue? Respectfully, Vivan
SuperMom - Jul 29, 2009 at 3:08 pm
Sleepless in-Sorry I got the date of the minutes wrong. The golfer Janzen's $250,000 t-shirt deal is discussed in the FTC board minutes of August 1, 2008. However, there is lots of "crazy" stuff in the August 22 minutes as well. Here is the correct link---

http://s3.amazonaws.com/content.newsok.com/documents/FTCIncBoardMinutes_Aug01.pdf
Bill, denver - Jul 29, 2009 at 2:40 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
Sleepless in-In response to your question about a golfer being paid to wear a FTC t-shirt the following links leads you to the FTC board minutes and the internal auditors memo. You'll have to "scroll through" the minutes/auditors report to find the discussion of the golfer Janzen who was paid $250,000 to wear the t-shirt. Additionally, according to the auditors report Larry Jones did not follow the Boards direction regarding terms of Janzen's contract. I hope this helps.

From Feed The Children board minutes of August 22, 2008

http://s3.amazonaws.com/content.newsok.com/documents/FTCIncBoardMinutes_Aug22.pdf

From the Internal Auditors memo to the FTC Board of Directors covering issues regarding Board Meetings May 16, 2008 through October 24, 2009

http://s3.amazonaws.com/content.newsok.com/documents/FTC_ListofResultionsMay16-Oct24.pdf


Bill, denver - Jul 29, 2009 at 2:28 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
Hey SAT-if you have some "real" facts to present, please do so. On the other hand, for you to just continue posting the FTC web-site and then continue "knocking" the national organizations and concerned/knowledgeable individuals whose sole purpose is to protect the general public seems, to me, like you have a vested interest in Feed The Children. Do you?
Bill, denver - Jul 29, 2009 at 12:19 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
I think an issue can be the cost of the photos. Having just recieved a July e-mail from Feed the Children about the number of TV-soap stars they have assembled in Africa for a television show is aweful. The cost of moving pampered people whether they be tv-actors, professional golfers, or basketball, baseball players is a big one. The Feed the Children Fundraising strategy seems to be to pay for the wealthy to have a good time put it on TV or color print and if there is any left over then the poor can have it. Do the Actors or other celebraties get paid directly or indirectly? If so how much? I understand the golfer gets paid to wear a Feed the Children shirt in public.
Sleepless in - Jul 29, 2009 at 11:49 am
Dude get a life. Go to Africa or somewhere and do something good instead of blasting people who are actually doing something to help humanity. Next time you are up here commenting, post some pictures of yourself actually helping people....

I go by
http://www.feedthechildren.net/
Sat - Jul 29, 2009 at 9:58 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Sat
When folks seek the truth about Feed The Children before giving their "widows mite" are you SERIOUSLY saying they are "people not with good intentions who are trying to cause harm.."?

Are you REALLY saying the following nationally respected non-profit over site organizations are "people not with good intentions who are trying to cause harm.."?

NewsOK is the leading newspaper in Oklahoma-home of Feed The Children. The site contains board minutes and articles regarding Feed The Children and Larry Jones.

http://newsok.com/feedthechildren

Charity Navigator is one of the leading national non-profit “watch-dog” organizations.

http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.comments&orgid=3691

The Chronicle of Philanthropy is the premier non-profit publication in the United States.

http://philanthropy.com/news/index.php?id=8918

http://philanthropy.com/news/updates/7331/leadership-struggle-under-way-at-big-national-charity-court-battle-shows

Charity Watch is a well respected non-profit oversight organization.

http://www.charitywatch.org/articles/feedchildren.html
Bill, denver - Jul 28, 2009 at 5:09 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
This is a very good Charity. I know the awesome work they are doing. We just have a lot of people not with good intentions who are trying to cause harm....

Check this out
http://www.feedthechildren.net/
Sat - Jul 28, 2009 at 4:00 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Sat
On a billion dollar operation, external auditors cannot see/know everything. If management wants to "spoof" them, it happens..Not sure about legal exposure as it depends on what they were paid to do and how much they could/should have known. FTC changes "outside" auditors frequently, I believe recently the firm was from Florida-odd! Keep in mind, that the "internal accountants" do all the accounting. The "outside" auditors just spot check the work then issue the report. Several years ago the chief "internal" accountant was fired because he forged the name of the "outside" auditor on the public reports. As I've said before, in order to "trust" the numbers you've got to "trust" the management. Accountability is the key as we are all often prone to "fudge" things when it's to our benefit.
Bill, denver - Jul 27, 2009 at 10:57 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
If the example of medical donations below is common practice, how can the Auditors (seems as though they were paid over $500,000 for the Audit 2007-2008) signed their name to bad practice and bad values? I suppose bad practice regarding money is even more obvious from the board minutes. Do they the auditors have a legal risk as they did for Enron or the Madoff affairs?
Sleepless in - Jul 27, 2009 at 10:10 am
To set the record straight since I have been very "vocal" about Feed The Children. I know Larry, Francis, Larri Sue and Allen. They are not evil folks. They have done much good. However, as someone once said "absolute power corrupts absolutely". Whether it be preachers, politicians, financial advisers or anyone possessing power over others, accountability is a requirement. Accountability requires a willingness to submit to higher authority. It requires some degree of humility. Unfortunately, uncontrolled power often robs us of this grace.
Bill, denver - Jul 26, 2009 at 4:28 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
Sleepless-

Regarding your Gift in Kind medicine question, below is a quote from The American Institute of Philanthropy (AIP) web-site. They are a nationally prominent charity watchdog service whose purpose is to help donors make informed giving decisions. For the complete article I suggest you go to the link I've provided below for additional details. This is just one example ($22,000,000 ) of the Gift in Kind charade that takes place on medical donations within Feed The Children.

http://www.charitywatch.org/articles/feedchildren.html

"This shipment, which also included 1 pallet of containers, 72 cases of bottled water, 50 bags of flour, and 1 case of discount pharmacy cards, was valued by FC at $118,932.61, according to the "Certificate of Donation" FC provided to MS. This amount seemed extremely high to Dawson, who later contacted FC for a breakout of how the different items were valued. He discovered FC was valuing the pharmacy cards at "about $23 per card," accounting for about $112,000 of the shipment's total value, according to Dawson.

In its 2007 tax form FC reports accepting donations of pharmacy cards worth over $22.4 million, but does not provide a breakout of the amount it distributed to other charities or, more importantly, explain how it determined that the cards are really worth this amount. Similar cards are readily available for free through numerous web sites and organizations. At least some of the pharmacy cards were initially donated to FC from marketing services company Vertrue Inc. According to the informational material attached to the pharmacy cards MS received, people using the cards may "save an average of 20% on prescription drugs." Dawson said he was not able to distribute any of the pharmacy cards he received from FC due to lack of interest because they cannot be used in conjunction with any other discounts, such as with a person's health insurance. "If one side were blank we could use them for scratch paper," said Dawson, referring to the cards."
Bill, denver - Jul 24, 2009 at 11:51 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
Most of the thing donations seem to be medicines representing over one half material mentioned in the financial report on the Feed the Children Website. What are they and where do they go?
Sleepless in - Jul 23, 2009 at 2:50 pm
BTW-FTC uses about $6,000,000 of your donor cash for ALL international operations. The expensive "Hollywood" house cost $1,200,000. That's 20% of all the CASH Larry Jones spent for "all the hungry children" on the planet earth.
Bill, denver - Jul 23, 2009 at 12:33 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
FTC Fan, one more observation. The $1,200,000 house in California for home/office is "way over the top". A 2 bedroom apartment/office for $2,000/month would have been more than adequate. It's not like they were needing it for "Hollywood" parties. Additionally, Larry, in his statement admitted he was speculating on the property. Do you really think what I've said is appropriate for a non-profit entity just "feeding hungry children"? If you read the police report a senior employee illegally entered the house and removed certain items. The police called a "residential robbery". Now, if you were the daughter of Larry Jones wouldn't you think he would have just called you on the phone and asked for whatever he wanted rather than putting a guy on an airplane from OKC to LAX. And, don't think for one moment this guy, whoever he was, went out to California without Larry Jones himself, personally telling him to do it. What a mess, huh?
Bill, denver - Jul 22, 2009 at 11:28 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
FTC Fan, you comment "Let’s talk about fundraising, which for 2008 was less than 7% of the total expenses." You must be a nice person however,when you say 7% of total expenses you are thinking this is a small percentage. Wrong! Think about this-7% of WHAT? You're "falling for the GIK" charade as I attempted to explain in my post of July 22. For example when you include the distribution of GIK in total expenses (which is what you and FTC are doing) then 7% may be close. But remember, the GIK was donated to FTC, didn't cost them a thing. You and the general public donated around $100,000,000 in CASH. Fund raising as a percent of cash donations was approximately 70%. Don't feel bad about your conclusion, most folks don't understand this "charade" either. Said another way, and this is an approximation, over 70% of EVERY CASH DOLLAR donated to Feed The Children is used for fund raising related expenses. BTW-no other reputable humanitarian organization uses 70% of every dollar an individual donates for "fund raising". Hope this helps!
Bill, denver - Jul 22, 2009 at 11:17 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
First of all, the house in Burbank was purchased as an office and a place for Miss Jones to stay while she worked in CA. It was never used as, or intended to be her primary residence, which is the home that SHE purchased and owns in OKC. In my opinion, FTC elected to purchase a tangible asset instead of throwing away money on rent for an office and an apartment. When the real estate market recovers, it may prove to be a wise decision. Secondly, Miss Jones’ salary as General Council is very reasonable for an attorney licensed to practice in multiple states. She’s a grown woman, and not part of the same household as her parents. It’s misleading to combine her salary with theirs. Mr. and Mrs. Jones’ salaries COMBINED compare favorably to the salaries of CEO’s in other organizations of comparable size and scope. Let’s talk about fundraising, which for 2008 was less than 7% of the total expenses. The bulk of the fundraising expense is for the infomercials you see on TV. Consider how many people have learned about the plight of impoverished people, and have been inspired to DO SOMETHING as a result of these films. I believe many of these people never donate to FTC, but instead support church programs, volunteer in soup kitchens, give direct assistance to someone who needs a hand, or otherwise support the MISSION of FTC. In other words, I believe the impact of the films extends far beyond just what is donated to FTC. I believe this is part of Mr. Jones’ plan. Thank you, Mr. Jones!
FTC Fan, Midwest City - Jul 22, 2009 at 10:25 pm
In case someone is wondering—The basic FTC “game” is how they account for Gift in Kind. A legal/accounting technique. Without going into too much detail, GIK is all the non-cash things they receive as a donation. For instance, under educational items this is mostly paperback books (with the front covers removed) that retailers have taken off their shelves. A truckload of approximately 40,000 pounds would be valued at approximately $400,000. A truckload of something like bottled water/carbonated soda would be consider “food and nourishment” and be valued at close to the same amount. The books are “dumped” at small non-profits in impoverished areas of the country. Who, in turn, count the items as income to their own non-profit. When a large company has a huge surplus of carbonated soda, maybe like Snapple when they were going out of business, they get a tax credit for giving truckloads to FTC. FTC gets to count the truckloads as income. Often over the years the “educational items” i.e. discarded, not purchased and supposedly destroyed paperback books will total over $40,000,000. Of course “some” of the items donated are legitimate but when considered as a whole the percentage is nowhere near the numbers they report under the various categories. That is unless one considers truckloads of soda pop as “food and nourishment for hungry children”. When you look at their efficiency i.e. fund raising costs compared to total income it seems reasonable, around 9 or 10 %. But, when you remove the GIK (which many humanitarian entities do not count) FTC’s fund raising consumes most all of the cash donations from the public.
Bill, denver - Jul 22, 2009 at 1:45 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
In case anyone is interest here is the site for the Oklahoma State Court Network that will provide filing, ruling etc on the lawsuit filed by the original board after Larry Jones attempted a "coup" when the original board wanted him to take an unlimited sabbatical because of Larry's malfeasance with donor funds. BTW-the OSCN tracks the use of this web-site and those who attempts to delete their references.

http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/getcaseinformation.asp?query=true&srch=0&web=true&db=Oklahoma&icasetype=&iDATEL=&iDATEH=&iCLOSEDL=&iCLOSEDH=&number=CJ-2009-907&iLast=&iFirst=&iMiddle=&iID=&iDOBL=&iDOBH=&SearchType=0&iDCPT=&iDCType=0&iYear=&iNumber=&icitation=&submitted=true
Bill, denver - Jul 22, 2009 at 1:42 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
Larry, no matter how you "spin-it" in your "press release" the $1,200,000 house, the fact that you authorized the robbery of the home of your own daughter, the "coup" you attempted against your own board, your IRS violations, your deceitful words and actions to your own employees and donors-I just have one observation. We, and I mean everyone "in the know" CANNOT MAKE SENSE OF YOUR NONSENSE! And don't say "you're just feeding hungry children" again. That "justification" is getting really old! The good you/your employees/your donors have done is no excuse for your deceitful treatment to the wonderful folks in our country. Madoff, I'm certain did "some" good things in his lifetime. Judas did as well, he even took care of the money. But both betrayed the trust that had been placed in them by others, as have you.
Bill, denver - Jul 22, 2009 at 1:31 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
"Just because you've done some good is no excuse for fraud, outright theft of donor funds and unrepentant deceit. I'm confident that Madoff did some charitable acts by distributing funds to those in need. Even Judas did some good, in fact he handled the finances BUT he betrayed our Lord and that trust. I won't comment further as ANYONE who has read all the documentation like me can see through this charade! Who was it that said "Oh, what a tangled web we weave"? Sorry Larry, you gotta go and be praying it not off to be Madoffs celly."
Bill, denver - Jul 22, 2009 at 1:28 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
If you are interested in national comments/articles and rating about Feed The Children from within the non-profit world go to:

The Chronicle of Philanthropy website at:
http://philanthropy.com/news/index.php?id=8918

Charity Navigator at:
http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.comments&orgid=3691

American Institute of Philanthropy:
http://www.charitywatch.org/articles/feedchildren.html
Bill, denver - Jul 21, 2009 at 11:57 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
Has anyone else had their posts from the last 3 days erased?
Bill, denver - Jul 21, 2009 at 11:47 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill

News Photo Galleriesview all