Oklahoma City realty pros go to bat for 1031 tax-free exchange

Some prominent property transactions probably wouldn't have occurred without the provisions of Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, which allows deferment of capital gains taxes.
by Richard Mize Modified: December 20, 2013 at 6:19 pm •  Published: December 21, 2013
Advertisement
;

The Senate Finance Committee under Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., wants to do away with the widely popular tax accounting regulation known in real estate circles as a 1031 tax-free exchange.

Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code allows exchanges of certain types of investment property with deferred capital gains taxation under certain conditions. Tax can be deferred in a series of transactions, carried over to each asset until a taxable transaction occurs, which means a sale without reinvestment.

The following transactions met the conditions. Would the deals have been dealt without it?

•  David Le Norman's purchase of One Benham Place, the eight-story office building at 9400 Broadway Extension, in 2011.

•  The office tower-retail mall 50 Penn Place, as it changed hands a time or two the past 10 years.

•  The Warr family's 2006 sale of Mayfair Village, the shopping center developed by C.B. Warr in the 1950s on both sides of May Avenue between NW 47 and NW 50. The same goes the same year for the sales of Midland Plaza at Independence Avenue and Northwest Expressway, and Market Place Shopping Center in Edmond.

•  Developer David Austin's Oak Hollow addition, on the north side of Memorial Road, between Bryant Avenue and Coltrane Road, in 2002.

Those are just a handful of investment purchases and sales made here with a tax-free exchange. Add to it lots of apartment sales — and other smaller, or just quieter, transactions that nobody said much about.

Would the deals have been struck without the 1031 exchange? The answer depends on the deal, of course. But probably not.

Property specialists weighed in this week, at my request, on the Baucus proposal, which the senator says is meant to “simplify tax rules, lessen the burden on small businesses and jump-start job growth.”

Here are excerpts:

•  Richard C. Howell, Holliday American Mortgage LLC: “The rule ... increases the number of transactions. This benefits the real estate industry because there are a greater number of transactions. Repeal of the rule would decrease demand for real estate and, therefore, decrease values.”

•  Ford Price, Price Edwards & Co.: “The intent is to allow and motivate people to sell investment property or business property and effectively recirculate that profit back into the economy by deferring the tax. Many people will not sell unless this is allowed, so profits are locked up and not reinvested. ...

Continue reading this story on the...

   Please Login to your Facebook account to see comments
by Richard Mize
Real Estate Editor
Real estate editor Richard Mize has edited The Oklahoman's weekly residential real estate section and covered housing, commercial real estate, construction, development, finance and related business since 1999. From 1989 to 1999, he worked...
+ show more


Trending Now


AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    Referees flag Chiefs safety Husain Abdullah for celebration penalty after slide and prayer in...
  2. 2
    Billy Crystal breaks down in tears during Robin Williams memorial
  3. 3
    Family asks for help finding hit-and-run driver
  4. 4
    Residents Voice Bridge Safety Concerns Near Lexington
  5. 5
    Found: Oklahoma police find missing 9-month-old & 6-year-old
+ show more