Slater: No. It was needed at the time and, through the Memphis series, he was great. Once he hit the skids, shooting 19-of-61 (31 percent) combined against the Clippers and Spurs, Scott Brooks should have had a quicker trigger, going to Jeremy Lamb sooner. But Butler was helpful and, if he doesn’t hit a sudden slump at the worst possible time, we’re talking about what a great move it was to bring him in.
Tramel: In retrospect, yes. Better to have given Jeremy Lamb those minutes and let him develop. You could say Butler helped OKC get over the hump against the Grizzlies, but since we’re retrospecting, I think Lamb could have done the same thing. Scotty Brooks just needed to relieve the defensive pressure Memphis was placing on mostly Kevin Durant and to some degree on Russell Westbrook. Lamb could have done that. And the growth benefits to Lamb would have been mighty.
Do you think the Thunder will re-sign Butler?
Mayberry: I don’t. But you never know. Butler proved in the regular season that he has something left in the tank, and of course he’s eager to get a championship. So it could happen. But at this point, I don’t see it happening until late September if it does and for little more than the veteran minimum.
Slater: Better chance than people think. The no-show at exit interviews paints a cloudier picture — and could be a sign the professional relationship is over. But knowing how the Thunder likes to construct its roster, he still potentially fits a need. A well-respected locker room presence, a cheap contract and a guy who Scott Brooks trusts. My guess: He’s not back. But I wouldn’t be surprised.
Tramel: No, I don't think the Thunder will re-sign Butler. I don't think it's impossible, but it will have to be for the minimum salary. And the Thunder is ready to move on down the road with Lamb and Perry Jones and probably Reggie Jackson as the primary perimeter players off the bench. Butler seemed to be a solid character guy, so there's always a chance, but I doubt it.