Share “Oklahoma City Thunder, where's the D?”

Oklahoma City Thunder, where's the D?

Assistant coach Ron Adams was largely responsible for the Thunder's stingy defense last season. Now he's in Chicago. How much is Ron Adams' loss to blame for the Thunder's defensive problems this season?
By Darnell Mayberry, Staff Writer, dmayberry@opubco.com Modified: January 16, 2011 at 11:13 pm •  Published: January 16, 2011
Advertisement

photo - OKLAHOMA CITY THUNDER BASKETBALL: The OKC Thunder close out a practice session on their new court at the Ford Center in Oklahoma City, OK, Tuesday, Oct. 28, 2008. BY PAUL HELLSTERN, THE OKLAHOMAN ORG XMIT: KOD
OKLAHOMA CITY THUNDER BASKETBALL: The OKC Thunder close out a practice session on their new court at the Ford Center in Oklahoma City, OK, Tuesday, Oct. 28, 2008. BY PAUL HELLSTERN, THE OKLAHOMAN ORG XMIT: KOD

The players haven't changed. And neither have the plays.

Only one thing is different about the Thunder's defense.

Ron Adams.

The wily assistant coach who was largely credited for revamping the Thunder's once ragged defense jetted to Chicago last summer. With his departure, Oklahoma City's defense has seen a drastic drop off.

Entering tonight's game at the Los Angeles Lakers, which marks the midway point of the season, the Thunder has regressed in opponent points, opponent field-goal percentage, opponent 3-point field goal percentage, blocked shots, opponent turnovers and defensive efficiency.

That's just about every major defensive category, with the lone exclusion being rebounding.

Several players admit that Adams' departure has been a significant factor.

“Ron Adams was a big part of our defense,” said Thunder center Nenad Krstic. “He was always talking about that. He was always getting on some guys if they don't play good defense. We really miss him.”

Practice sessions are said to be the same this season as last year's. And from a scheme standpoint, the Thunder hasn't changed anything. But having Adams harp on all the finer points made a major difference, players say.

“The way we drilled it and the way he explained it to some of the younger guys,” explained guard Thabo Sefolosha.

Continue reading this story on the...


Thunder defense, 2010-11 vs. 2009-10

Category; 2010-11 (rank); 2009-10 (rank)

Opp. points; 102.1 (20th); 98.0 (11th)

Opp. FG; .468 (23rd); .448 (T6th)

Opp. 3FG; .375 (25th); .340 (3rd)

Opp. rebounds; 40.7 (11th); 40.7 (T10th)

Steals; 8.4 (4th); 8.0 (6th)

Blocks; 5.5 (T8th); 5.9 (1st)

Opp. turnovers; 14.8 (T11th); 15.1 (T5th)

Opp. FT attempts; 24.9 (14th); 24.6 (T17th)

Def. efficiency; 104.6 (16th); 101.6 (8th)

By John Rohde

AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    Big 12 adds affiliate members in gymnastics, wrestling
  2. 2
    1 dead in crash between semi-truck and motorcycle in Norman
  3. 3
    University of Cincinnati police officer who shot man during traffic stop charged with murder
  4. 4
    Drake vs. Meek Mill Explained in 60 Seconds
  5. 5
    Why 2016 quarterback Austin Kendall will star at OU
+ show more