The Thunder did not want to trade James Harden.
And the Thunder did not trade the James Harden you see today.
As the one-year anniversary of the most controversial transaction in Oklahoma City's NBA history came and went Sunday, those are the two most important things to remember.
A close third is the Thunder is still a consensus championship contender despite the trade, and it is projected to continue to be just that for the foreseeable future thanks in part to the assets the franchise took back — two of them, Jeremy Lamb and Steven Adams, will start showing their value in the season opener Wednesday.
Yet for the past year, those three facts have been the untold stories of the Thunder when it comes to the Harden saga. What you don't hear, largely because the organization has kept quiet about it while being determined to move on, is how Oklahoma City made the best decision it could have under the circumstances.
A perfect storm ultimately is what led to Harden's departure, not penny-pinching.
First, the Thunder hit home runs in three consecutive drafts, landing Kevin Durant in 2007, Russell Westbrook and Serge Ibaka in 2008 and Harden in 2009. Few franchises have ever had such a string of success.
Then, just as the first wave of that quartet became eligible for contract extensions, the NBA went through a labor dispute. The eventual agreement contained a complete set of new rules, most of which made it more taxing on teams to hoard talent. NBA commissioner David Stern even came through Oklahoma City on Christmas night 2011 trumpeting “player sharing” as one of the triumphs of the agreement. It was supposed to even the playing field and aid the struggling small markets.
Instead, it crushed Oklahoma City.
Star players like Durant and Westbrook suddenly became eligible for larger contracts — retroactively in Durant's case — and the penalties for retaining a star-studded roster and blowing past the annual tax threshold became more punitive.
What happened next was Harden outgrew Oklahoma City. He wanted to be the head honcho. Despite having never proved himself capable of being anything more than a sensational sixth man, Harden had his heart set on being the star and being paid accordingly, as evidenced by his refusal to accept an offer close to a max contract.
Had the Thunder given in to his desires, Harden would have become the first sixth man in league history on a max contract. Oklahoma City also would have had three perimeter players on max contracts, something else the league has never seen.
Additionally, the Harden that thrilled in Houston last season when given free rein never could have been the same player alongside Durant and Westbrook. With only one basketball, it would have been impossible.
Still, some say, the Thunder could have tried to make it work.
In that case, this would have been the final year of OKC's championship window.
Let that sink in.
Contract extensions on both Harden and Ibaka would have kicked in this season, joining high-dollar deals currently out to Durant, Westbrook and Kendrick Perkins. Amnestying Perkins has been a popular suggestion for how the Thunder could have saved money, but it's one that never comes with a logical suggestion on how OKC would then fill the gaping hole that would be in the middle.