Oklahoma execution on hold after U.S. Supreme Court ruling
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a stay of execution for Oklahoman Garry T. Allen, who pleaded guilty in the 1986 shooting death of the mother of two of his children outside an Oklahoma City day care center.
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday upheld a stay of execution for Garry T. Allen while federal courts sort out questions regarding his mental competency.
In a brief order, the high court rejected Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt's effort to move forward with the execution, which had been scheduled for Thursday. A federal judge in Oklahoma City issued a stay, and the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld it late Thursday.
Allen's attorneys said Allen is insane and therefore can't constitutionally be executed. They are also challenging an Oklahoma law that gives a prison warden authority to determine whether to declare an inmate competent for execution.
Allen, 56, killed Gail Titsworth outside an Oklahoma City day care center in 1986, and he was shot in the head by a police officer at the scene.
Allen's case has been winding slowly through state and federal courts since, with his mental competency the repeated focus. After a jury found him mentally competent to stand trial in 1987, he pleaded guilty to killing Titsworth and was given the death penalty.
The U.S. Supreme Court in 1997 overturned his death sentence because he was declared competent to stand trial under an Oklahoma law ruled unconstitutional by the high court.
He was given the death sentence again. The state Pardon and Parole Board voted in 2005 to commute his sentence to life in prison — a recommendation ultimately rejected by Gov. Mary Fallin. In 2008, a jury voted 9-3 that he was mentally competent to be executed.
See our commenting and posting policy.