TULSA, Okla. (AP) — With a healthy and enviable array of power sources, Oklahoma could meet or even beat targets set out Monday by the Environmental Protection Agency to curb greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, environmental groups say. But it appears the state — no stranger to taking on the federal government over energy policy — might dig its heels in.
The plan unveiled by President Barack Obama's administration suggests a 35 percent reduction of carbon emissions in Oklahoma by 2030. Attorney General Scott Pruitt, who has sued the EPA in the past over a different issue, said the agency is being used to "pick winners and losers."
"While the EPA says the new greenhouse gas emissions rule for existing power plants gives states flexibility, this claim is little more than lip service," Pruitt said in a statement. "Through its top-down approach, the EPA is taking away the ability of the states to design and implement plans suitable to each state's unique circumstances."
Pruitt had unveiled his own plan last month, which would leave power in the hands of the states to set power plant emissions standards.
Oklahoma has had a combative past in dealing with federal energy issues. Pruitt's office sued the EPA in 2011 after the agency rejected the state's plan to reduce regional haze at national parks and wilderness areas, including the 59,000-acre Wichita Mountain Wildlife Refuge in southwestern Oklahoma.
The lawsuit alleged that the EPA overstepped its authority in taking the action. Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case.
Unlike some other states that rely overwhelmingly on coal, Oklahoma derived more than half its energy from natural gas and just about 38 percent from coal in 2012, according to EPA estimates. It also marked tremendous growth in wind energy in recent years, which provided nearly 15 percent of the state's electricity in 2013, according to the American Wind Energy Association.