Oklahoma pension changes should produce long-term benefits

The Oklahoman Editorial Published: October 28, 2013
Advertisement
;

IT'S been said that compound interest is one of the greatest powers in the world. Through it, small changes today can generate large results years down the road.

The same rule applies to public policy. Laws that appear to have a limited impact upon enactment can foster major change as time goes by. Unfortunately, those changes aren't always positive.

State Auditor Gary Jones estimates a special retirement benefit that Oklahoma lawmakers granted to elected public officials in 1988 has cost the state more than $1 billion since the law was passed. That law — since repealed — created a different retirement formula for elected officials that effectively doubled their benefits.

Jones recently told The Journal Record that elimination of the double benefit has helped, but he warned that many officials are still grandfathered into the old formula. Taxpayers will continue paying those inflated benefits for years to come. In one case, Jones noted a district attorney making $121,000 per year will get $171,000 annually in retirement benefits thanks to the old formula. The formula was “better than winning the lottery” for its beneficiaries, Jones said.

It's distressing that statutory changes — which appear little more than legislative self-dealing — have cost taxpayers more than $1 billion since their enactment. It's encouraging that lawmakers have ended that special benefit. But the main lesson of the whole episode is that small changes can have major long-term impact.

Now state lawmakers are considering pension reforms they hope will incrementally generate positive results in the future. Currently, Oklahoma's state pension funds are only 65 percent funded, with over $11 billion in debt. The Oklahoma Teachers Retirement System is only 55 percent funded with around $8.4 billion in unfunded liability. These figures are actually a significant improvement compared with several years ago when lawmakers voted to require funding for any cost-of-living adjustment and altered the minimum retirement age in certain cases.

| |

Advertisement


Trending Now



AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    Dave Chappelle Reveals Shockingly Buff New Look
  2. 2
    Peaches Geldof Funeral to Be Held on Easter Monday
  3. 3
    Mayor Who Fired Lesbian Police Chief Caught On Tape In Homophobic Tirade
  4. 4
    NBA commissioner wants to raise age limit to 20
  5. 5
    Dream guitars I wouldn't mind calling my own (34 Photos)
+ show more