Oklahoma voters to decide intangible-property tax issue

Along with being bombarded with presidential ads before November's election, Oklahoma voters are going to hear a lot about intangible property and whether this ethereal asset should be taxed in businesses locally and across the state.
BY MEGAN ROLLAND mrolland@opubco.com Published: August 20, 2012
Advertisement
;

Oklahoma voters will have to resolve a complicated tax issue in November that state officials estimate could cost the state's county governments and schools up to $50 million in 2013.

But if voters don't widen a current tax exemption by voting yes on State Question 766, Oklahoma businesses fear they will be hurt badly by taxes on their intangible property — something that almost no other state taxes.

“It's not really a tax break as much as just a drawing back on the tax that I think is inherently unfair,” said Rep. David Dank, R-Oklahoma City. “To tax people on such things as trademarks and patents and customer lists and that sort of thing and you have just have those people who were centrally assessed being taxed on that, is unfair.”

Dank, who co-chaired a task force that studied the issue, said if the state does nothing, it will be a huge tax increase on virtually all of Oklahoma's major businesses.

Also pushing the issue is AT&T, formerly the Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

The company sued the state Board of Equalization claiming that taxes it paid in 2005, 2006 and 2007 should have included exemptions for “intangible assets such as customer lists, customer relationships, assembled work force, databases, goodwill, employment contracts, patented technology, lease agreements, trademarks, and trade names, licensed software, an extensive advertising effort and the attendant copyrights on the advertising materials [and] technical documentation.”

The case went all the way to the Oklahoma Supreme Court, which ruled in September 2009 that those types of intangible properties were not exempt.

Voters had in 1968 passed a constitutional amendment defining exempt intangible property as cash on hand, gold, silver, bank drafts, certified checks, bank deposits, accounts and bills receivable, brokerage accounts, bonds, stocks and a variety of other specifically enumerated intangible assets.

AT&T spent the next two years lobbying state lawmakers on the issue.

The company reported to the Ethics Commission spending more than $7,000 on politicians and their spouses between September 2009, when the Supreme Court ruling was released, and June of this year. A company can only spend $100 per lawmaker per calendar year.

“A yes vote on SQ 766 will ensure that Oklahoma individuals and businesses won't face potentially the largest tax increase in state history,” said Tony Wyche, with AT&T public affairs. “Hunting leases, unused mineral rights, insurance policies, computer software, and even patents and inventions would all be subject to taxation without passage of SQ 766, and as one of the largest private investors in Oklahoma, AT&T stands with many Oklahoma families and businesses, large and small, who want to ensure that Oklahoma is poised for future jobs, investment, and economic growth.”

Bryan Gonterman, president of AT&T Oklahoma and a registered lobbyist for the communications company, also was a governor appointee to the Task Force on Comprehensive Tax Reform created by lawmakers during the 2010 legislative session. The task force held four public meetings to explore simplifying and creating fairness in the tax structure of the state.

The 21-member task force, which was comprised of lawmakers, business leaders, school officials and a county tax assessor, ultimately recommended a constitutional amendment be put before voters to expand the scope of the existing constitutional ad valorem exemption for specified intangible property.

The House and Senate approved Senate Joint Resolution 52, which brings the constitutional change to a vote of the people in November.

Court case fallout

Many Oklahoma business owners are concerned that by stating specifically in an opinion that intangible property like customer lists and databases weren't tax exempt, the Supreme Court opened the flood gates for local tax assessors to tax things that have never before been taxed in Oklahoma.

| |

Advertisement


Trending Now



AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    Dave Chappelle Reveals Shockingly Buff New Look
  2. 2
    Peaches Geldof Funeral to Be Held on Easter Monday
  3. 3
    Mayor Who Fired Lesbian Police Chief Caught On Tape In Homophobic Tirade
  4. 4
    NBA commissioner wants to raise age limit to 20
  5. 5
    Dream guitars I wouldn't mind calling my own (34 Photos)
+ show more