Oklahoma court ruling will hurt media's watchdog role

The Oklahoman Editorial Published: June 30, 2011

STATE workers won and the people who pay their salaries — the taxpayers — lost when the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled that it's not in the public interest for the media to request state employees' birth dates and employee identification numbers.

Open records expert Joey Senat, a professor at Oklahoma State University, said it best about the court's 7-2 ruling Tuesday: “The decision is based on the justices' subjective fears rather than facts.”

That is to say, the justices bought the argument forwarded by state employee groups and some members of the Legislature that this is a security issue — that disclosing a person's date of birth could lead to identity theft, which of course can be devastating as anyone who has experienced that can attest.

But law enforcement and other experts say a person's date of birth is no factor in cases of identity theft. Social security numbers and other data are far more useful in that endeavor. Indeed a person's chances of having their identity stolen are much greater if someone rifles through their mailbox, or if they lose their wallet.

Certainly the state doesn't worry much about the potential “hazards” of making dates of birth available. The DOBs of all registered voters can be obtained — for a fee — from the state Election Board. As The Oklahoman pointed out, the Department of Public Safety earns about $12 million per year selling motor vehicle records to insurance companies — records that include birth dates of licensed drivers.

| |


Trending Now


  1. 1
    Barresi opposes bill to cut state testing in social studies
  2. 2
    Oklahoma basketball: Guard Je'lon Hornbeak to transfer
  3. 3
    Man re-arrested in Pakistan for cannibalism
  4. 4
    Report: Joe Buck, Greg Norman to lead Fox Sports' golf coverage in 2015
  5. 5
    Opinion: What if the government guaranteed you an income?
+ show more