OU must decide on style of offense with Bradford

By Jake Trotter
Published: August 22, 2007

NORMAN — When Bob Stoops arrived in Norman eight years ago, he brought with him an offense that preferred to pass, the antithesis of Sooner football past.


Featured Video

Advertisement

Eight years later, Stoops' offensive philosophy continues to evolve closer to that of Bud Wilkinson and Barry Switzer, few passes and fewer mistakes in an attack meant to assist a dominant defense and efficient running game.

Tuesday, Stoops announced redshirt freshman Sam Bradford will start at quarterback in OU's opener Sept. 1 against North Texas.

Bradford defeated first-year freshman Keith Nichol and junior Joey Halzle in a three-way battle that dated back to the spring.

"I've been pleased with what Sam has done in practice,” Stoops said. "He has been the most consistent, hasn't made horrible plays and has taken charge of the huddle.”

Now, Stoops and offensive coordinator Kevin Wilson must decide what kind of offense they want with Bradford as the quarterback.

If a recent trend is any hint, look for the Sooners to continue to rely heavily on their rushing attack with runners Allen Patrick, DeMarco Murray and Chris Brown to take pressure off a young quarterback.

"We still need the balance and blend,” Wilson said. "But balance to me isn't 50-50.

"Balance to me is when everyone knows you have to throw it, and you can still throw it when you need to.”

Since Heisman Trophy winner Jason White left three seasons ago, OU has altered its identity, throwing only when it needed to.

In 2003, White threw 451 times, while the top two rushers combined for just 371 attempts.

Last season, quarterback Paul Thompson tossed 336 passes, but Adrian Peterson and Allen Patrick carried the offense with 357 rushes.

"I think personnel has had a lot to do with that,” said quarterbacks coach Josh Heupel, who passed for 53 touchdowns in Stoops' first two seasons, 21 more than in Stoops' last two. "When you look at the personnel now, we've got good running backs, so we've got to find a way to get them their touches.”

Part of OU's offensive evolution has occurred because the Sooners have recruited more talented running backs.

But the bigger reason?

OU hasn't had a starting quarterback for two consecutive seasons since White, who followed Nate Hybl and Heupel, all three starting in more than one year.

The Sooners are hoping the 6-foot-5, 213-pound Bradford can bring multi-year stability back to the position by starting for four years.

And if that occurs, OU eventually could throw more again.

"If you can do both, you're going to be better,” Wilson said. "If we're one dimensional, then it's really easy to play run defense.

"And (OU's second opponent, Miami) is one of the premier teams in run defense.”

Bradford has proven he can pass, completing 12 of 17 throws for 130 yards and four touchdowns in Saturday's scrimmage, effectively ending the quarterback competition.

"We have a young quarterback,” receiver Manuel Johnson said. "So defenses are going to test him with the blitz and make Sam beat them with his arm.

"So far, Sam has risen to the occasion.”

Bradford, however, will have to make plays in games, not scrimmages, to keep his job, since Stoops said Tuesday he likely won't redshirt Nichol, who has played well at times this preseason.

"Sam is one of the more composed guys,” Wilson said. "He has played better in camp, and we hope it transfers to Saturdays.

"But we won't know until we get out there.”


Toolbar sponsored by: David Stanley Ford
Bookmark and Share



Comments

Thank you for joining our conversations on NewsOK.com. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.

Editor's note: It is not our intent to offer comments on crime or fatality stories.

Leave a comment. Log in below or sign up (it's free).

   
Chris, your “recruiting 101” lecture affirmed my point. OU doesn’t seem to have any trouble at all recruiting great running backs… every year. Being an elite program the Sooners should be going after and landing the top talent at quarterback yearly. I understand kids want to play when they get to campus, but that doesn’t excuse OU’s consistent failures at securing decent quarterbacks. Here’s a good one, why the hell didn’t we get Sam Keller? When he walked away from AZ State we should have been all over him. Stoops knew the team needed a quarterback next season. It was after Bomar was booted, and before Nicholes was on the radar. If OU had a guy like Keller the Sooners would be a firm title contender which is a much better position that “how much does OU’s quarterback suck, and is the rest of the team good enough to make up for it.”
Jason, Seattle - Aug 23, 2007 5:29 PM
Report as inappropriate
And one other thing. Coach Stoops isn't stockpiling RBs over QBs. He's just had plain bad luck with these kids. Rawls was a mis-behaver, Bomar had a couple of issues with underage drinking before he did his big crime as well. Grady couldn't participate in the QB competition because of an intercession class that he had to complete so he just transferred. That's 3 top level QBs snatched out of the Sooners stable in as many years. I personally think the staff has done a great job keeping the pipeline of great QBs (and all positions, for that matter) going. Looking at this team all I see is solid depth. I expect really big things this year.
Shepard, Stonewall - Aug 22, 2007 11:21 PM
Report as inappropriate
Only one issue with the last post saying we can't get another QB for next year if Nichol decides to leave or something happens to Bradford is that we already have. Landry Jones, 5 star, elite 11 has already committed to OU for next year so then we'll be in a real stink. The three star (Sam) beats out the 4 star (Nichol) and the JUCO stud (Halzle), then we get a 5 star (Jones). Sounds like alot of tough times coming down on the kids. I know coach Stoops & Co. have to do that to keep OU an elite program, but I've never seen a possible pipeline like this one. But keep in mind we had Tommy Grady, Brent Rawls, Nate Hybl & Jason white all at the same time too. It'll work itself out. How many would have guessed that the curly headed kid from Tuttle would win the Heisman and be a near perfect passer in college?
Shepard, Stonewall - Aug 22, 2007 11:12 PM
Report as inappropriate
For one thing, I'm glad that OU doesn't have to use as many trick plays as they used to. Just like in the Boise State game, trick plays are generally used to make up for a deficit in talent. And Jason, as far as why OU doesn't bring in five-star QBs year after year, here's a little recruiting 101: The top high school quarterbacks don't go where they're not likely to play. Think about this timeline. In 2004, Rhett Bomar -- who Rivals had ranked as the No. 1 pro-style QB -- commits to OU. Who else from that class is going to sign with the Sooners? Nobody. Bomar redshirts, so again, no top QBs in the 2005 class are going to sign with OU because it looks like they'll be carrying the clipboard for most of the college career. Bomar ends the 2005 season as the Holiday Bowl MVP, and everyone figures he'll be the starter for the next three years. Now how many of the top quarterbacks will we get in the 2006 recruiting class? -- remember, signing day is more than five months before Bomar's booted from the team. That's right -- zip. OK, you think, Bomar's gone, Thompson's a senior, it should be easy to recruit a top-flight QB. Oh, wait, there's an NCAA investigation thanks to Bomar (and Quinn). And remember, a lot of these guys are being recruited as juniors (and younger). Even so, OU is able to get Nichol, a four-star QB. Now, QB recruiting in the immediate future can go one of two ways. First, if Bradford (or Nichol, if Bradford gets hurt) does well, that's probably going to make it tougher to recruit a five-star QB in the 2008 or 2009 classes.
MartzMimic, Oklahoma City - Aug 22, 2007 10:36 PM
Report as inappropriate
Doanne, would you rather have OU's record the past eight years or Texas Tech's?
Mike, Corpus Christi - Aug 22, 2007 3:21 PM
Report as inappropriate
I think Doanne makes some good points. When watching OU’s loss to Boise State I kept thinking “I remember when we used to play like that.” OU's play calling has become extremely pedestrian and predictable. Think back to the LSU loss in the 03 Sugar Bowl, if OU would have tried to establish the run before the 4th quarter we might have won that game. They knew exactly what we were going to do before we did it.

The only reason OU remains competitive in the Big 12 is because of the recruiting. Speaking of recruiting, this quarterback predicament Stoops has put the team in for the last three years is absurd. For the last several seasons the question going in has always been “how much is OU’s quarterback going to suck, and is the rest of the team good enough to make up for it.”

How bout’ recruiting a few more QB’s (not three star rated ones either) and fewer running backs.
Jason, Seattle - Aug 22, 2007 1:46 PM
Report as inappropriate
has anyone informed stoops that his moniker has changed from "big-game bob" to "play-it-safe bob"? i don't want one of the highest paid coaches in the country to bench star athletes and give the nod to players because "they've been there longer" and "deserve it". OU fans don't want "OK"... they want GREAT! mark my words: stoops will never live up to the great coaches of the past play "safety"...
debuke, okie - Aug 22, 2007 12:12 PM
Report as inappropriate
I'm glad we have Coach Stoops and proud to call him our head coach. He is certainly in the top 10 coaches in the NCAA and maybe the top 5, some years
#1. I've been following OU football for 40+ years
and am an OU Alum. I hope Coach Stoops stays with us for the long haul. He is a quality coach and man.
william, destin - Aug 22, 2007 10:35 AM
Report as inappropriate
Doane, It's hard to even dignify your post with a response. It's quite obvious you have little to no ability to develop a sound argument or justifiable argument. If by "teams he hasn't seen before" you're referring to out of conference games, he's 4-3 (including last year's Oregon heist) over the past two years. So, I don't understand the point behind your 5-5 statement. Anyways, Bob Stoops is a proven winner. He’s restored OU football to an elite status and overcome many obstacles in the process. This year will be more evidence of his stellar ability as a coach and ultimately a winner.
Daniel, La Verne - Aug 22, 2007 11:29 AM
Report as inappropriate
Doane, I must admit I have wondered a few times about whether the coaching decisions were the best, but the dynamics must be tremendous at that level, not a job I would want to attempt. Sometimes you have to play "not to lose" but that usually reflects the talent and coaching on the other side of the field and who does the best job of "adapting and overcoming", not to mention timing. Oh yea, and Doane, you forgot Jim McKenzie in there too. And I do remember, too. Good luck to Sam. I hope by the end of the year we are yelling Sa Sa SSaaaammmm like we used to yell QQQQQQQQQ for Quinton Griffin.
ED, DUMAS - Aug 22, 2007 9:45 AM
Report as inappropriate
Doanne, first of all, that was so unintelligible, I'm not really sure what you were saying. I think you're trying to say that since OU struggled during the 2005 season and took a few games to recover from the stomach punch of Big Red Sports and Imports last year, that Bob Stoops can't coach. I just don't see it. And Switzer didn't win 95% of his games.
Rick, Norman - Aug 22, 2007 8:56 AM
Report as inappropriate
doane ???? what are you thinking. Bud, Chuck, Gomer?? Were you even around back then? If so that would explain your senility. TCU was and still is a pretty darn good team. Texas will find that out early this year just as we did a couple of years ago. I don't know who you are refering to (no ability to coach) I think we are paying a few million dollars for a man who can't coach. Get real get a life just make it your own not sooner football. THE MAN CAN COACH
kevin, oklahoma city - Aug 22, 2007 6:18 AM
Report as inappropriate
aloha jake,
i just wanted you to know, that if you check the last two seasons, first five games, bob stoops is only 5 and 5. he has no ability to coach against teams, that he hasn't seen before. he can coach against teams in the big 12, because he sees them every year, but doesn't have the ability to coach against new teams. he talks a good game, but ultimately he gets outcoached. please look at the 2005 and 2006 first five games. he's lost his gameliness to win, plays way to safe to not lose. there are those few times that he's gambled, but oklahoma offense football is offensive to watch. bob stoops plays too safe. his record attests to what i am saying. wait until miami comes to town, nothing to lose and everything to gain, that was the attitude of bob 6 years ago. plays not to lose, that's bob stoops football in oklahoma. expects his defense to stop the offense, as oppose to out offense to score. his play calling is nfl style, run and then pass, and everybody knows when he is going to pass. he is predictable. oklahoma football during switzer was, we expected to win, face anyone and everyone, and we won 95% of the time. today, stoops plays marshmellows to set up oklahoma not to lose before the texas game. i was a big fan of bob's early on, but he has taken the ou team to the level of penn state, win ugly. aloha doane m. york, loved ou until 2004. bob can never be straight about ou football, switzer was, chuck fairbanks was, gomer jones was, bud was. bob isn't a straight talker.
doane, mililani - Aug 21, 2007 11:57 PM
Report as inappropriate