Share “Police in legal minefield on Ariz....”

Police in legal minefield on Ariz. immigration law

Associated Press Modified: September 6, 2012 at 7:02 pm •  Published: September 6, 2012
Advertisement

PHOENIX (AP) — The most contentious part of Arizona's immigration law finally has approval to move forward, surviving a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, a heated national debate and two years of state politics.

But the practical effect of what critics call the "show me your papers" provision remains to be seen.

Immigrants are worried they'll be harassed by officers emboldened to pull them over because they look Hispanic.

Officers — who will be required to ask people they encounter while enforcing other laws to show they're in the county legally if they find them suspicious — say they'll be open to lawsuits if they're accused of racially profiling, or if they're accused of not adequately enforcing the law.

"It leaves us in a very, very, very, extremely gray area," Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik said Thursday. "So now we get sued when we do profile, and we get sued if we don't profile."

Yet, it may be difficult to see the results.

Parts of the law, passed by a Republican-controlled state legislature and signed by Republican Gov. Jan Brewer in 2010, have been in effect for months but largely ignored — mostly because they seem to address problems that don't exist, immigrant rights advocates say.

Dan Pochoda, the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona's legal director, said the parts of the law known as SB1070 already in effect "have had virtually no impact." He added that "we haven't even heard of any attempts to use" the other provisions.

Those sections of the immigration law include a ban on the adoption of so-called sanctuary city policies. The rule is aimed at preventing local government officials from deciding to pick and choose which federal immigration policies to enforce and which to ignore. There have been no reported violations in the state.

Another provision says that state and local agencies can't have a ban on sharing information, and therefore must cooperate in determining whether a person is a legal citizen eligible for public benefits.

Two other sections were viewed as minor changes to existing laws.

None have had any noticeable impact on how police go about their jobs.

The newly approved section of the law could be difficult to enforce, too.

Police will be required to check the status of people they encounter even investigating minor infractions, such as noise complaints. But federal immigration officials have said repeatedly they are focused on serious or repeat offenders. And local officials can't make immigration arrests, or detain immigrants for too long on the side of the road.

Continue reading this story on the...