Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford

Privatizing Oklahoma's worker’s comp splits task force members

By The Associated Press    Comments Comment on this article9
Published: November 6, 2009

A legislative task force recommended Thursday that Oklahoma’s workers’ compensation agency be privatized, but it was divided on how to achieve that.

Multimedia

Following months of study, the Task Force on the Privatization of CompSource Oklahoma drafted a list of recommendations for the future of the agency that include mutualizing it, meaning it would be owned by its policyholders, or selling it outright.

Legislation that would authorize the state to sell the agency would likely result in a lawsuit challenging the state’s ownership of its assets, said Rep. Dan Sullivan, R-Tulsa, co-chairman of the task force.

Officials familiar with Oklahoma’s worker’s compensation system have told task force members that the state Supreme Court has never clarified whether the assets of CompSource — created by the Legislature in 1933 as the State Insurance Fund — are owned by the state or its policyholders.

"We should first determine who is the owner,” Sullivan said. Officials of a Chandler-based insurance company said last month that the state could raise between $150 million and $200 million if it sold the agency to the highest private bidder.

The state has been experiencing a deepening budget shortfall that has pushed tax revenue $388.3 million below estimated collections during the first three months of the fiscal year that began on July 1. State agencies have been forced to reduce their budgets by 5 percent.

Three members of the task force, including Sullivan and Sen. Cliff Aldridge, R-Midwest City, also co-chair of the task force, recommended that CompSource be sold. Five others recommended mutualization.

The recommendations will be forwarded to the governor and legislative leaders by Dec. 1.

The statute that created the task force says lawmakers intend to privatize CompSource no later than Dec. 31, 2010.

State law requires employers to have insurance to compensate injured workers. CompSource, a nonprofit insurer, said it has 26,000 policyholders — including state, county and municipal government agencies — and writes 35 percent of the workers’ compensation policies in the state.

The agency specializes in small firms or those whose workers have dangerous jobs in fields such as the oil and natural gas and construction industries, which private insurers will not take because the chance of paying claims is too high.

But CompSource has been criticized over the years by those who believe its status as a state agency gives it an economic advantage over private insurers and that the state should not be in the business of writing insurance.

Others, including members of the task force, have expressed concern that privatization could erode CompSource’s status as the state’s workers’ compensation insurer of last resort and force dramatic increases in workers’ comp rates.

Dan Ramsey, a task force member and president of the Independent Insurance Agents of Oklahoma, said he believes the task force should not recommend selling Compsource merely as a way of raising revenue for the state during lean economic times.

Mike Seney, a task force member and senior vice president of operations for The State Chamber, said he favors mutualizing the agency similar to how the workers’ compensation agency in Texas was privatized in 2005.

Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford





Need Affordable Health Care?
Get Affordable Health Insurance Quotes Online - Plans from $30 / Month
USInsuranceOnline.com

Free 2009 Credit Report and All 3 Scores
Free 3-bureau Credit Report – includes Transunion, Equifax, Experian.
FreeCreditReportsInstantly.com


Leave a Comment

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online

Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.


Log in below or sign up (it's free).





How come there were no blue collar workers on a task force that is making recomendations that would by and large affect them. No attorneys specializing in Workers Comp or even Worker Comp judges. Looks like a stacked deck.
John, Norman - Nov 6, 2009 at 3:49 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore John
What's really bad about privatizing it is most state agencies, boards & commissions insure Oklahoma state employees through CompSource for worker's comp coverage. Prvatizing this agency (CompSource) will result in increased worker's comp premiums to the entire state workforce.

If these jokers in office really wanted to run government right, they should make the state entirely self insured, rather than continuing to put tax dollars into private profits.

I forget thought that the politicians calling for this change are members of the party that wants to rid our country of government altogether. Go figure....

Nice posts, Kevin, Richard, Erica, TeddyR & Martin!
Concerned, Central Oklahoma - Nov 6, 2009 at 11:55 am
Well said Martin. Remember when W wanted to privatize social security? That would have gone over well when the market crashed and the economy sank. I can see it now, elderly Americans lined up in soup lines as far as the eye can see. Thank god he didn't get that through.
TeddyR, Oklahoma City - Nov 6, 2009 at 11:43 am
Okay, let me get this straight. The government helped create an insurance pool to help protect high risk workers who weren't able to be covered by PRIVATE insurance companies. Now politicians want to make that a PRIVATIZED system. So, they in essence want to make it a program that won't cover those who they intended to cover in the first place because their contributors feel that there is unfair competition. Why can't the private companies just start giving those employers a choice that is comparable to the the government established system? I'll tell you why they don't want that. Because it would cut into their profit margin. And that is why these Republican law makers want a chnage. So, their contributors can get their hands on more money and policies to jack up the costs, lower the coverage, and expand their bottom lines 'cause momma wants to vacation more often in the Bahamas or they want to go skiing more often at Vail. It boils down to a bunch of political whores selling their political power to their contributor johns.
Martin, Norman - Nov 6, 2009 at 11:38 am
Wow, not only are the repubs trying to kill health care reform, they are trying to make more people uninsured as well. Why don't they just save time and start shooting people.
TeddyR, Oklahoma City - Nov 6, 2009 at 10:45 am
Looks like publicly provided insurance of any kind is an automatic NO for all rePUBLICans!
Concerned, Central Oklahoma - Nov 6, 2009 at 8:48 am
Compsource exists as the insurer of last resort for employers in high risk fields. Or fields where the likely hood of a workers comp claim is very high. it was created because these employers could not find private workers comp insurance. So how does privatizing it make any sense? Wouldn't that just leave many employers unable to afford workers comp and or paying such high premiums they have to cut down their work force. This seems counterintuitive.
Erica, Oklahoma City - Nov 6, 2009 at 8:16 am
Is this losing money now? Baby with bathwater?
Richard, Del City - Nov 6, 2009 at 7:20 am
Let me guess--the members of the task force in favor of this were republican, and they just can't agree which of their campaign contributors they are gonna make even richer...
Kevin, Oklahoma City - Nov 6, 2009 at 7:15 am

    News Photo Galleriesview all