Proposal would allow Oklahoma cities to ban dog breeds

Opponents say conditions, not the breed, have more to do with aggressive behavior in dogs.
BY MICHAEL MCNUTT mmcnutt@opubco.com Modified: January 16, 2013 at 10:15 pm •  Published: January 17, 2013

Dog lovers are rallying against a bill that would allow cities to ban any breed of dog.

The Central Oklahoma Humane Society is against the measure and an online petition to Gov. Mary Fallin on change.org to oppose it has gotten more than 4,700 signatures in less than five days.

Sherry Stinson, who owns a pit bull terrier she rescued three years ago, said she started the petition effort because the proposal is an attempt to outlaw pit bull terriers.

“It's a backdoor way to ban pit bulls,” said Stinson, of Bartlesville.

Sen. Patrick Anderson said cities should have the right to restrict certain breeds if they determine them to be a threat. Legislators convene Feb. 4 for the first session of the 54th Oklahoma Legislature.

“If they don't want poodles, I guess they can bring it before the city council and vote not to have poodles,” said Anderson, R-Enid.

While his measure isn't breed-specific, Anderson said he is leery of pit bull terriers.

“Pit bulls make me nervous,” he said. “I wouldn't want them around my children. My bill's not designed to go after any breed in particular, but my personal feeling about pit bulls is I wouldn't own one.”

There is no ban on pit bull terriers in Oklahoma.

Efforts to ban pit bull terriers in 2006 failed; a state law passed in 2006, however, does define dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs and sets punishment for owners who fail to restrain them.

Anderson said he's already heard from critics of his measure, Senate Bill 32, including owners of pit bull terriers who say it's not the dog, but the owner, that causes the problem.

“I don't doubt their sincerity in that, but clearly we have an obligation to protect citizens, and if a community feels like they need to pass a city code or ordinance to protect their citizens, they need to be able to do that before someone is injured or even killed,” he said.

The Central Oklahoma Humane Society will oppose Anderson's measure, said Christy Counts, the organization's president and executive director.

“We definitely oppose that legislation,” she said. “Research has shown over and over and over again the most common predictor of bites by dogs has more to do with the spayed and neutered and tethered than the actual breed. If a dog is spayed or neutered and it's part of the family, the likelihood of severe aggression is very low.”

Dogs that are chained or tethered develop what is called barrier frustration, a lack of socialization that increases aggression and the likelihood of an attack, she said.

Enforcing breed bans would be difficult because bloodlines of many dogs are murky. DNA tests might be required to prove a dog's breed, she said. Some dogs only have a percentage of a breed and it's unclear whether they would be included.

“There's just no real way to regulate that type of legislation. Specific behavior of an individual dog is a better predictor of future behavior.

“Research has shown that with the new DNA tests of dog breeds that a lot of times people assume a dog is a pit bull, for example, but when you do a DNA test there's not a drop of pit bull in it. For you to actually be able to uphold any of this in a court of law you'd have to DNA test all these dogs,” Counts said.



Trending Now


AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    It’s harder to be a poor student in the U.S. than in Russia
  2. 2
    Man fatally stabbed in west Tulsa early Sunday
  3. 3
    How brain imaging can be used to predict the stock market
  4. 4
    Bridenstine tours Fort Sill, satisfied with facility's transparency
  5. 5
    10 Most Popular Wedding 'First Dance' Songs
+ show more