WASHINGTON (AP) — To see the impact of strategic military decisions on local communities, look no further than Marinette, Wis.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel's vision for leaner, more versatile military targeted the littoral combat ship, the marquee product of the city's biggest employer. And that could mean lost jobs in Marinette, a city of roughly 11,000.
"It's been hanging out there," Marinette Mayor Denise Ruleau said. "I think the community is aware that we have two 10-ship contracts. That it will supply them with five years' worth of work."
But Hagel's proposal to cancel 20 of a planned 52 ship orders raises questions about the five years after that. Marinette has a relatively diverse economic base, but its biggest employer is Marinette Marine, which builds the littoral combat ships with defense contractor Lockheed Martin.
About 2,000 jobs in Marinette are directly linked with the littoral combat ship program. The current projected overall cost to the Navy for the littoral combat ship program is roughly $34 billion.
Ann Hartnell, the executive director of the Marinette County Association for Business and Industry, said dozens of other businesses across Wisconsin and the region, like parts suppliers, also would be affected by the cuts.
"I'm not going to worry until the cuts are final and I think that's kind of the attitude of everyone I know," Hartnell said. "We know it may be coming."
Marinette Marine has other projects besides the combat ships. But state officials big and small have strongly resisted efforts to cut the program. This week, both of Wisconsin's senators, Democrat Tammy Baldwin and Republican Ron Johnson, said they would fight to preserve the program, as did the region's congressman, Rep. Reid Ribble, R-Wi
Ribble said the debate over the program wasn't over.
"The future of the (littoral combat ship), or its next iteration, is far from settled and there are numerous debates and discussions that will be occurring in the days and weeks ahead," Ribble said.
The ships also are built in Mobile, Ala.
Speaking Monday, Hagel questioned the ships' capabilities against more modern weaponry. He said the ships were designed to "perform certain missions ... in a relatively permissive environment." And he said the Navy needed to determine whether the ships had enough protection in an era with more advanced military technologies.