Share “Prosecutor: Pistorius is untruthful, an...”

Prosecutor: Pistorius is untruthful, an egotist

By CHRISTOPHER TORCHIA and GERALD IMRAY Published: April 10, 2014

PRETORIA, South Africa (AP) — Oscar Pistorius’ credibility was consistently questioned at his murder trial Thursday as the chief prosecutor argued that the star athlete had a string of unlikely excuses why he wasn’t to blame in the three gun charges he faces on top of murder for the shooting death of girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp.

Prosecutor Gerrie Nel, in cross-examining Pistorius for a second day, questioned Pistorius’ honesty, which goes to the heart of the case, asserting that the double-amputee Olympian wouldn’t “accept responsibility for anything” and reacted incredulously to Pistorius’ explanation of why a gun he was handling fired under a table in a packed restaurant.

Pistorius said the gun, a Glock pistol, went off while he was holding it but insisted it happened without him pulling the trigger. The incident happened just weeks before model Reeva Steenkamp was shot to death by Pistorius on Feb. 14, 2013.A police expert testified earlier at the trial that the gun couldn’t be fired without the trigger being pulled.

Nel said: “We have you in possession of the gun, a shot went off, but you didn’t discharge the gun? … I’m putting it to you, you fired that gun. There is no other way,” Nel said. “You are lying.”

“I respect Mr. Nel’s comment,” Pistorius replied, “but I didn’t pull the trigger on that firearm.”

Pistorius also said two witnesses, a former girlfriend and a friend, were both lying about an incident in 2012 when the runner is alleged to have fired his gun out the sunroof of a moving car. Pistorius said he wasn’t guilty of a fourth charge against him, illegal possession of ammunition for rounds of .38-caliber ammunition found in a safe in his home after the Feb. 14, 2013 death of Steenkamp. He said he was safekeeping the ammunition for his father.

But Nel said Pistorius’ father Henke “refused” to make a statement to police on the ammunition being his.

“You just don’t want to accept responsibility for anything,” Nel said to Pistorius. Pistorius’ answers to the accusations were short denials.

By attacking Pistorius’ credibility on the other three charges, Nel was pushing the prosecution’s argument that Pistorius, a celebrated disabled athlete, is also lying about killing his girlfriend by mistake in the pre-dawn hours of Valentine’s Day last year.

Pistorius, 27, says Steenkamp’s death was a terrible accident after he mistook her for an intruder and fired four times with his licensed 9 mm pistol through a toilet door and into a cubicle. Prosecutors say he intended to kill the 29-year-old after a loud argument heard by witnesses and charged him with premeditated murder — for which he faces 25 years to life in prison if convicted.

Pistorius insisted again Thursday, the second day of his cross-examination by Nel — that the shooting was an accident and he did not intentionally fire four shots.

Continue reading this story on the... has disabled the comments for this article.


  1. 1
    Where does OU rank among college football's running back units?
  2. 2
    The best jobs for every personality type
  3. 3
    Lankford: Changing Washington 'takes strong families, strong churches and strong communities'
  4. 4
    Trial delayed for former sheriff's deputy charged with sexual battery
  5. 5
    County Commissioner booked on new charges; discussion on ouster set for Monday
+ show more


× Trending crime Article