The Chavez brothers prefer hip-hop to ranchero music, pizza to chile rellenos and basketball to soccer. For them, Mexico is an assortment of black-and-white photographs sitting on the mantel, some stories told to them by their parents and a few, brief visits during their childhood.
"My dad, he understands some English. If you talk to him, he will try to talk back,” said Francisco Chavez, 15, a sophomore at Northwest Classen High School. "But it sounds all whacked, more like ‘Spanglish' than anything else.”
Their father, a construction worker, speaks enough English to get by in the workplace. Their mother, who stays at home, speaks none at all. Around the dinner table, their native tongue dominates and their Mexican heritage is the prevailing culture. Out in the world, the opposite is true.
A study sponsored by the Manhattan Institute, a public policy research group, released May 13, suggests today's immigrants have done a better job of assimilating than immigrants of previous generations, but progress has been obscured by their numbers. Among immigrant groups, Mexicans have had the most difficulty when it comes to economic and civic assimilation, the study shows.
Many are able to keep speaking Spanish
The U.S. immigrant population has nearly tripled since the 1970s, and has doubled since 1990. In Oklahoma, immigrants account for nearly 30 percent of the state's population growth since 2000, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Mexican and Guatemalan immigrants assimilate slower in terms of economics and civics because of the proximity of their native countries, the dominance of the Spanish language and U.S. immigration policy, he said.
"It's sort of unprecedented in American history to have immigrants so dominated by one language. So it becomes less necessary for immigrants to assimilate,” said Jacob Vigdor, Duke University professor and the report's author. "It does run a risk of forming a distinct sector in society, and I think that's what some people are worried about.”
Politics may help explain adaptability
When Vinh Nguyen left Vietnam, he had no choice. He had been a lieutenant colonel in the South Vietnamese army. When Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese April 30, 1975, he knew if he didn't escape, he would be killed.
The new communist government already had confiscated his house, his car and his land.
"I left that morning. I left my country by boat,” Nguyen said. "I left with one shirt, one pair of pants, one pair of shoes and not one penny.”
He and his wife and four children crowded onto a boat with 30 others, assuming they would never see their homeland again.
A man on the boat had a radio. After about 18 hours of sailing, they heard the voice of an American rescue vessel en route to rescuing a boat full of refugees.
Read the Measuring Immigrant Assimilation in the United...