Recent decisions could jeopardize Affordable Care Act's major provisions

Attorney Brandon Long of McAfee & Taft discusses recent rulings regarding the Affordable Care Act.
Oklahoman Published: July 31, 2014
Advertisement
;

Q&A with Brandon Long

Provisions in Affordable Care Act in peril as court rulings conflict

Q: I understand there were two court decisions issued last week that could have major implications for the Affordable Care Act?

A: Yes, last week two federal appeals courts issued conflicting rulings on a major provision of the ACA regarding whether individuals can obtain tax credits for health coverage obtained on a federally-established ACA Exchange. On July 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that individuals cannot obtain tax credits for coverage bought on a federal exchange. That same day, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit resolved the same issue in a completely different way — and held that individuals can obtain tax credits for coverage purchased on a federal exchange.

Q: Why does this matter to Oklahoma employers?

A: The ACA provides that, effective Jan. 1, a large employer (generally one with 50 or more full-time employees) has a choice: either (a) offer certain coverage to its full-time employees, or (b) pay certain penalties. While the ACA uses the threat of penalties to induce large employers to provide their full-time employees with health coverage, these penalties only can be triggered if a full-time employee goes to an exchange, enrolls in coverage, and receives a tax credit. Currently, only 14 states have established exchanges. The federal government has established exchanges in the remaining 36 states including Oklahoma. If the decision issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is correct, then tax credits are not available to individuals enrolling in coverage through an exchange established by the federal government. Thus, in states like Oklahoma where the federal government established the exchange, large employers couldn’t be subject to any employer-mandate penalties because such penalties depend on an individual receiving a tax credit. Similarly, an individual without coverage couldn’t be subject to the individual mandate penalty for the same reason.

Continue reading this story on the...

by Paula Burkes
Reporter
A 1981 journalism graduate of Oklahoma State University, Paula Burkes has more than 30 years experience writing and editing award-winning material for newspapers and healthcare, educational and telecommunications institutions in Tulsa, Oklahoma...
+ show more


Trending Now


AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    KOKH: Naked woman 'couldn't remember' how she got to Edmond, police say
  2. 2
    KFOR: Animal rights group calls Oklahoma Senator's pigeon shoot "cruel"
  3. 3
    Hobby Lobby president talks about importance of God in business at Owasso Character luncheon
  4. 4
    Rickie Fowler's haircut is ready for the Ryder Cup
  5. 5
    Former Texas Tech DC Matt Wallerstedt says 'don't believe' rumors of dismissal
+ show more