Recent editorials published in Indiana newspapers

Published on NewsOK Modified: February 18, 2014 at 11:37 am •  Published: February 18, 2014
Advertisement
;

The Journal Gazette, Fort Wayne. Feb. 18, 2014.

The fight goes on

Start with the good news. The effort to put HJR 3, the anti-gay-marriage amendment proposal, on this year's ballot appears to have failed.

This will spare Indiana the ignominy of becoming the national crossroads of the gay-marriage debate in the fall election season.

Information and enlightenment are more accessible than ever, but troglodytical ideas can still find a toehold almost anywhere. With luck, the spotlight will soon land on some other struggle in some far-away state.

That doesn't mean the rainbow coalition of people, companies and institutions to fight this can rest on its laurels. There is important work yet to be done if Indiana is to permanently avoid, and not just delay, this assault on the basic rights of some of its citizens.

We have to build on the positives.

Last week, in the Rules and Legislative Procedure Committee, Senate President Pro Tem David Long presided over an impassioned but civil discussion of the marriage amendment. Long treated proponents and opponents with dignity and respect, gently reminding speakers from both sides to finish if they ran past their five-minute limit and thanking them all for their testimony.

The high point of that debate came when Jennifer Fisher of Fort Wayne ascended the podium to make two points, one professional, the other personal.

Fisher, who works as a recruiter for a northeastern Indiana company, first reiterated the pragmatic point that spokespeople from Lilly and Indiana University, among others, also made: HJR 3, in whatever form it's voted on, sends a message of exclusion at a time when our state should be doing all it can to be attractive and welcoming to businesses and workers.

But Fisher told the legislators that she had a personal reason, as well, for fearing the amendment. Fisher is gay and she and her partner, who is a police officer, want to start a family. As all with family members in law enforcement do, Fisher worries that her partner could go to work some day and never come back. "If she is killed in the line of duty," she told the legislature, "someone could take my family." Fisher told the legislators that, to her, the marriage amendment held "the potential to take away everything that I love."

Looking around the Senate chamber, Fisher noted the irony that many of those who were speaking in favor of HJR 3 were members of minority groups that in the past had benefited from government protection of their rights.

"I'm not asking you to believe that my love and my life are right or wrong," she told the group. "I'm just asking you to protect my rights."

After her testimony, Fisher said she had been courteously treated by the committee and that she hoped that legislators who hear directly from people with her point of view would modify their views.

That didn't happen this time around. The Senate committee passed HJR 3 to the full Senate, though without reinserting the infamous "second sentence" that could have placed the measure on this year's election ballot. Monday, the Senate voted 32-17 to pass the altered amendment bill.

And despite Fisher's heartfelt testimony, despite the onrush of change, the legislators who voted for HJR 3 will be ready to start the process again next year. Even worse, the courageous handful of House Republicans who voted to take the second sentence out of the amendment are already facing challenges from the righteous right.

Indeed, Freedom Indiana, which did such a good job of bringing opponents of the amendment together statewide, issued a statement giving opponents permission to "breathe a collective sigh of relief."

It's a moment not for complacency, but for those who value the American tradition of freedom and respect for diversity to fight back at the ballot box - or resign themselves to years more of self-righteous intolerance at the state legislature.

___

Tribune-Star, Terre Haute. Feb. 16, 2014.

Wholesomely Indiana

Just a few hours after "Honest to Goodness Indiana" was announced on Wednesday as our state's new tourism brand, it was already being pummeled by social media pundits for being too hokey, hicky and, well, Hoosiery.

"Golly gee-wilikers Pa! Can we really go to Indiana? It's so WHOLESOME," said one person who wrote on The Indianapolis Star's Facebook page in derision of the brand.

And our newspapering colleagues at The News-Sentinel in Fort Wayne headlined their editorial on the brand: "This is, honest to goodness, the best they could do?"

Even the website of the Indiana Department of Tourism Development, the very office that announced the brand, carried comments from critics who asked how the brand squares with a state whose governor and Republican leaders in both houses of the Legislature persisted in their desire to have a ban on gay marriage cemented into the state constitution. How, those critics asked, could that Indiana be seen as welcoming to all who might want to visit to explore the Wabash River, the verdant hills and gullies, the musical festivals, the community celebrations, the sports and entertainment events, and the offerings at our great colleges and universities?

Perhaps it was bad timing by the state to have launched the brand change amid the torrent of a divisive same-sex marriage debate. But even absent that fractious debate, the brand — perhaps any brand — was sure to draw potshots at the outset, and it did. No brand pleases everyone, including the brand that is being replaced: "Restart Your Engines."

Slower to speak out will be those who support the brand's embrace of traditional Hoosier values of hospitality, honesty and essential goodness. (Cynics, though, will find reasons to deny that Hoosiers actually demonstrate those values to outsiders or those who don't conform to the majority view.)

Lost in translation may be the difference, in the arcane world of marketing, between a brand and a slogan. A marketing professional explained it to us this way: Nike's swoosh represents the brand. "Just Do It" is the slogan. And the brand encompasses everything about the commodity being promoted, including the audience's desired reactions to it. In this case, the brand is that which attracts people to Indiana for a visit or vacation.

While many, including us, would have preferred something more assertive, less folksy than "Honest to Goodness Indiana," the sound of that brand may grow on Hoosiers — and others — as they see and hear messages built around the brand in ads and promotions in print, on the Web and on TV and radio. Those ads aren't apparent yet, even on the tourism development department's website.

A long-standing Terre Haute company, Williams Randall, was deeply involved in developing the brand as part of what has been reported to be a $100,000 contract with the state. So owners and staff at the company are seeing this debate up close — and personal. And not flinching. "We are confident in the new brand," McKenze Rogers of Williams Randall's Indianapolis office told The Star. "We are focused solely on moving forward."

| |

Advertisement


Trending Now



AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    KOCO: Oklahoma City shooting range first to offer bullets, booze
  2. 2
    Lance Armstrong makes rare public appearance ... as a bike mechanic
  3. 3
    Conservative Activist Claims Women Paid The Same As Men Won't Find Husbands
  4. 4
    Report: Thunder to open playoffs on Saturday
  5. 5
    Former Sonics guard Gary Payton: Durant, Westbrook 'the new era'
+ show more