Retired military officers seek U.S. Supreme Court review of 1st Lt. Michael Behenna's case
A group that includes five retired four-star generals says the high court should clarify the right of self-defense for soldiers serving in combat zones. Behenna, an Oklahoman, is serving time for unpremeditated murder in a combat zone.
WASHINGTON — A group of retired U.S. military generals and admirals is urging the U.S. Supreme Court to grant the appeal of 1st Lt. Michael Behenna, arguing that the high court must clarify the right of soldiers to defend themselves in combat zones.
Videoview all videos
Apr 29Coming up in Tuesday's Oklahoman: Oklahoma City Police...
Feb 7The parents and brother of U.S. Army 1st Lt. Michael...
Photoview all photos
NewsOK Related Articles
The Edmond soldier's case, according to a brief filed on behalf of 37 retired officers and a former Defense Department official, warrants review by the high court because a ruling against Behenna by the military's top appeals court “defies common sense” and endangers service members.
Among those signing the brief are a former chief of Naval Operations; a recent commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan and a former NATO Supreme Allied Commander; five retired four-star generals signed the brief, as did retired Air Force Maj. Gen. Jay T. Edwards, the former commander of the Oklahoma City Air Logistics Center.
Behenna is serving a 15-year sentence in Fort Leavenworth, Kan., for killing a suspected terrorist in 2008 in Iraq. Behenna was ordered to take the Iraqi man — Ali Mansur — home, but took him instead to a remote area, forced him to strip and then questioned him at gunpoint. Behenna said at his court-martial that he shot and killed Mansur in self-defense after the Iraqi threw a piece of concrete at him and lunged for his gun.
Behenna was convicted of unpremeditated murder in a combat zone, a sentence that was upheld by the Army's court of criminal appeals and, in a 3-2 decision last summer, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.
The court ruled that Behenna essentially lost his right to self-defense when he pointed the gun at Mansur and couldn't regain it unless Mansur escalated the conflict or attacked as Behenna tried to withdraw.
“Even assuming for a moment that Mansur could have escalated the level of force, we conclude that a naked and unarmed individual in the desert does not escalate the level of force when he throws a piece of concrete at an initial aggressor in full battle attire, armed with a loaded pistol, and lunges for the pistol,” the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces ruled.
News Photo Galleriesview all
- 83911Oklahoma tornadoes: 'It took it all'
- 66115Oklahoma weather: Severe storm updates
- 33602Oklahoma State football: Limiting Wes Lunt's transfer options makes Mike Gundy look bad
- 20416Oklahoma weather: Crews work to clear storm damage in Oklahoma City as the state braces for severe weather Sunday.
- 18059Oklahoma Severe Storm Updates
- 13064Oklahoma sucker-punched by second round of twisters
- 9549Oklahoma City tornado so large, may not be recognized, officials say