Ruling ‘a step too far'

 
| Published: March 16, 2008    Comment on this article Leave a comment

Oklahoma Supreme Court Justice Yvonne Kauger and Vice Chief Justice James Edmondson opposed the full court's decision last week to restrict online access to public court documents while supporting rules to redact some personal information. Here are excerpts from Kauger's dissenting opinion which, by the way, is available on the court's Web site, www.oscn.net:

Multimedia

Videoview all videos

Open Government? thumbnail

Open Government?

Mar 15Bryan Dean speaks with State Attorney General Drew...

More Info


Yvonne Kauger

Related content

NewsOK Related Articles

In this computerized, Internet age, courts, with the help and the direction of legislatures, are taking fiscal responsibility by reducing paperwork, reducing copying costs, moving towards electronic filing and electronic transfer of records, and providing the public greater and easier access to information to which it is entitled. Court records are migrating from paper form to electronic form where information may be disseminated in bulk, accessed over the Internet, or both. In a step towards this responsibility, the Court recently increased court costs by $15 to provide for improved computerization of all 77 county clerk dockets. However, as a result of the Court's order, not only is the Court taking a giant, 30-year leap backwards to a time when the personal computer was nonexistent, the public is now paying for access to a system which is made inaccessible by the order. ...

The Court is obligated to provide the public with access to court records. The judiciary has long recognized that case file documents, unless sealed or otherwise restricted by statute or court rule, are available at the courthouse for public inspection. The common law right and the presumption of public access to court records relate to the public's right to monitor the functioning of our courts, thereby insuring quality, honesty, and respect for our legal system. ...

With the invention of each new method of conveying information, it becomes more difficult for the courts to seal and protect information without the individual cooperation of litigants and members of the Bar. Whether it is a development we welcome, the simple fact is that the tide of new media may not be ignored or dodged.

Page 1 of 2



Related Topics: Judiciary, Crime and Law



Leave a Comment

Thank you for joining our conversation on NewsOK.com. We encourage your discussion but ask that you stay within the bounds of our commenting and posting policy. Please help by flagging comments that violate these guidelines. Posts that contain obscene or vulgar language will be immediately flagged and not posted.

If you prefer your thoughts to appear in The Oklahoman, we encourage you to submit a letter to the editor.

Would you like to leave a comment?

Log in or sign up (it's free).

comments powered by Disqus


Woman is 53 But Looks 24
Mom reveals simple wrinkle secret that has angered doctors...
ConsumerLifestyles.org
Mom is 53 But Looks 25
53yr Old Mom publishes 1 simple wrinkle trick that has angered doctors.
www.ConsumerLifestyleMag.com

News Photo Galleriesview all