Share “Ruth Marcus: The lesson of 'Camp David'”

Ruth Marcus: The lesson of 'Camp David'

Oklahoman Published: April 16, 2014
Advertisement

The line between determination and delusion can be obscure. Sometimes, the distinction emerges only in retrospect, like a Polaroid image slowly appearing. In other instances, the difference between productive grit and self-defeating obsession is an artifact of chance, like the lucky bounce of a tennis ball at match point.

Sometimes, perhaps in the hardest cases, both phenomena operate simultaneously. Only hindsight will tell whether an effort was quixotic or brilliant; only good fortune can make it happen. Those are the twin takeaways from “Camp David,” the gripping new play at the Arena Stage here about the 1978 peace accord between Israel and Egypt.

“Camp David” tells the story of a 13-day summit that took place 36 years ago, but its lessons resonate today. Indeed, when I went to see “Camp David,” Secretary of State John Kerry had just endured a tongue-lashing from his former Senate colleague, Arizona Republican John McCain, on what he dismissed as Kerry’s pie-in-the-sky quest for an Israeli-Palestinian deal.

“It’s stopped. It is stopped. Recognize reality,” McCain lectured.

“Your friend Teddy Roosevelt … said that the credit belongs to the people who are in the arena, who are trying to get things done,” Kerry retorted. “And we’re trying to get something done. … Sure, we may fail. You want to dump it on me? I may fail. I don’t care. It’s worth doing. It’s worth the effort, and the United States has a responsibility to lead, not always to find the pessimism and negativity that’s so easily prevalent in the world today.”

People who know a lot more about the Mideast than I do agree with McCain’s dismissive assessment; people who know a lot more about the Middle East disagree with it as well. My colleague Jackson Diehl, who covered the region, has used the word “delusional” to describe Kerry’s quest for a deal. Bloomberg’s Jeffrey Goldberg asserts that Kerry “is not delusional” and “not wrong to keep trying.”

I see this all the time in politics, on matters less tantalizing than Middle East peace but still seemingly unattainable, from rewriting a broken tax code to fixing a shattered campaign finance system. I often wonder how politicians or the activists working on these Sisyphean tasks manage to haul themselves out of bed.

This may encapsulate the difference between journalists and politicians: the former are inclined to see the glass half-empty, and report accordingly; the latter cannot function without at least imagining it half-full. That optimism is built into the political DNA: Politicians don’t get elected to offices for which they don’t run.

Continue reading this story on the...