Senate probe shines light on televangelists' 'prosperity gospel'

By Eric Gorski
Published: December 27, 2007

The message flickered into Cindy Fleenor's living room each night: Be faithful in how you live and how you give, the television preachers said, and God will shower you with material riches.

Advertisement

And so the 53-year-old accountant from the Tampa, Fla., area pledged $500 a year to Joyce Meyer, the evangelist whose frank talk about recovering from childhood sexual abuse was so inspirational. She wrote checks to flamboyant faith healer Benny Hinn and a local preacher-made-good, Paula White.

Only the blessings didn't come. Fleenor ended up borrowing money from friends and payday loan companies just to buy groceries. At first she believed the explanation given on television: Her faith wasn't strong enough.

"I wanted to believe God wanted to do something great with me like he was doing with them," she said. "I'm angry and bitter about it. Right now, I don't watch anyone on TV hardly."

All three of the groups Fleenor supported are among six major Christian television ministries under scrutiny by a senator who is asking questions about the evangelists' lavish spending and possible abuses of their tax-exempt status.

The probe by Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, has brought new scrutiny to the underlying belief that brings in millions of dollars and fills churches from Atlanta to Los Angeles — the "Gospel of Prosperity," or the notion that God wants to bless the faithful with earthly riches.

All six ministries under investigation preach the prosperity gospel to varying degrees.

Proponents call it a biblically sound message of hope. Others say it is a distortion that makes evangelists rich and preys on the vulnerable. They say it has evolved from "it's all right to make money" to it's all right for the pastor to drive a Bentley, live in an oceanside home and travel by private jet.

"More and more people are desperate and grasping at straws and want something that will alleviate their pain or financial crisis," said Michael Palmer, dean of the divinity school at Regent University, founded by Pat Robertson. "It's a growing problem."

The modern-day prosperity movement can largely be traced back to evangelist Oral Roberts' teachings. Roberts' disciples have spread his theology and vocabulary (Roberts and other evangelists, such as Meyer, call their donors "partners.") And several popular prosperity preachers, including some now under investigation, have served on the Oral Roberts University board.

Grassley is asking the ministries for financial records on salaries, spending practices, private jets and other perks. The investigation, coupled with a financial scandal at ORU that forced out Roberts' son and heir, Richard, has some wondering whether the prosperity gospel is facing a day of reckoning.

While few expect the movement to disappear, the scrutiny could force greater financial transparency and oversight in a movement known for secrecy.

Most scholars trace the origins of prosperity theology to E.W. Kenyon, an evangelical pastor from the first half of the 20th century.

But it wasn't until the postwar era — and a pair of evangelists from Tulsa, Okla. — that "health and wealth" theology became a fixture in Pentecostal and charismatic churches.

Oral Roberts and Kenneth Hagin — and later, Kenneth Copeland — trained tens of thousands of evangelists with a message that resonated with an emerging middle class, said David Edwin Harrell Jr., a Roberts biographer. Copeland is among those now being investigated.

"What Oral did was develop a theology that made it OK to prosper," Harrell said. "He let Pentecostals be faithful to the old-time truths their grandparents embraced and be part of the modern world, where they could have good jobs and make money."

The teachings took on various names — "Name It and Claim It," ''Word of Faith," the prosperity gospel.

Prosperity preachers say that it isn't all about money — that God's blessings extend to health, relationships and being well-off enough to help others.

They have Bible verses at the ready to make their case. One oft-cited verse, in Paul's Second Epistle to the Corinthians, reads: "Yet for your sakes he became poor, that you by his poverty might become rich."

Critics acknowledge the idea that God wants to bless his followers has a Biblical basis, but say prosperity preachers take verses out of context. The prosperity crowd also fails to acknowledge Biblical accounts that show God doesn't always reward faithful believers, Palmer said.

The Book of Job is a case study in piety unrewarded, and a chapter in the Book of Hebrews includes a litany of believers who were tortured and martyred, Palmer said.

Yet the prosperity gospel continues to draw crowds, particularly lower- and middle-income people who, critics say, have the greatest motivation and the most to lose. The prosperity message is spreading to black churches, attracting elderly people with disposable incomes, and reaching huge churches in Africa and other developing parts of the world.

One of the teaching's attractions is that it doesn't dwell on traditional Christian themes of heaven and hell but on answering pressing concerns of the here and now, said Brian McLaren, a liberal evangelical author and pastor.

But the prosperity gospel, McLaren said, not only preys on the hope of the vulnerable, it puts too much emphasis on individual success and happiness.

"We've pretty much ignored what the Bible says about systemic injustice," he said.

The checks and balances central to Christian denominations are largely lacking in prosperity churches. One of the pastors in the Grassley probe, Bishop Eddie Long of suburban Atlanta, has written that God told him to get rid of the "ungodly governmental structure" of a deacon board.

Some ministers hold up their own wealth as evidence that the teaching works. Atlanta-area pastor Creflo Dollar, who is fighting Grassley's inquiry, owns a Rolls Royce and multimillion-dollar homes and travels in a church-owned Learjet.

In a letter to Grassley, Dollar's attorney calls the prosperity gospel a "deeply held religious belief" grounded in Scripture and therefore a protected religious freedom. Grassley has said his probe is not about theology.

But even some prosperity gospel critics — like the Rev. Adam Hamilton of 15,000-member United Methodist Church of the Resurrection in suburban Kansas City, Mo. — say that the investigation is entering a minefield.

"How do you determine how much money a minister like this is able to make when the basic theology is that wealth is OK?" said Hamilton, an Oral Roberts graduate who later left the charismatic movement. "That gets into theological questions."

There is evidence of change. Joyce Meyer Ministries, for one, enacted financial reforms in recent years, including making audited financial statements public.

Meyer, who has promised to cooperate fully with Grassley, issued a statement emphasizing that a prosperity gospel "that solely equates blessing with financial gain is out of balance and could damage a person's walk with God."


Toolbar sponsored by: David Stanley Ford
Bookmark and Share



Comments

Thank you for joining our conversations on NewsOK.com. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.

Editor's note: It is not our intent to offer comments on crime or fatality stories.

Leave a comment. Log in below or sign up (it's free).

   
What is the real purpose of a church? Is it to affirm our consumer lifestyle? Is it to affirm and promote political movements? Is it to give people hell? Or is the church to be a community that strives to live the precepts taught by Jesus and the apostles? To bring hope and healing? To challenge the dominant culture? As we have ignored religious history and the theological developments over the centuries, we have created a corrupt institution that is little more than a cult of personality in which the charismatic leaders have no accountability. Even if there are internal structures of deacons and elders, or boards, those too often consist of an inner circle of supporters and yes-men. Sadly, too many of us have sold our souls and our very ability to reason to others. While community is a vital element of a healthy spiritual journey, we are each ultimately responsible for using both head and heart to decide our path. The Divine does not require that we check our brains at the church door--or as we vegetate in front of the television.
sandra, shawnee - Dec 28, 2007 8:33 AM
Report as inappropriate
Anyone want to join me this weekend at one of Edmond's fine non-denominational churches for some good old time rock and roll? Ticket prices are going for 10% of gross earnings. Non-believers and wealthy sinners are welcome.
John, Oklahoma City - Dec 28, 2007 6:59 AM
Report as inappropriate
that lady is john from stigler's mom. have pity on her. they had a kid name "the real jason from edmond". he turned out to be as bent as randy terrill. so theres something to talk about sunday afternoon, while your not watching football.(the only show on sunday)
Randy, Moore - Dec 28, 2007 12:59 AM
Report as inappropriate
The government has really nothing to do with this other than determine if their collection money should be tax expempt anyway - so tax them, and give the money to Sandy Garret so she will stop complaining about not having any money for her administrators to waste! Please......
Lawerence, Oklahoma City - Dec 28, 2007 12:43 AM
Report as inappropriate
I wish Congress could spend there time dealing with more important issues such as - FEMA. Fix it or get rid of it. It has been how many years now of headaches and mistakes?
Lawerence, Oklahoma City - Dec 28, 2007 12:41 AM
Report as inappropriate
I noticed they weren't talking about they guy who asks for 1 thousand people to send him 1 thousand dollars so you can join his million dollar club. I haven't seen him on the usual channel lately so he may have ran out of money to ask for money. Nonetheless, I am a worst case scenario for most organized religions. Nowhere in my Bible does it tell me to give to a denomination. I know this worries at least one local organized religion because it represents its impending doom. I am one of the people who have left the "cooperative program" (some people will know about what I am talking." I am a direct giver. I support people locally, nationally, and world-wide. My support far exceeds 10 percent. Whereas if it went to an organized religion, a penny out of 10 dollars would reach these people. Lets look at a dollar. Church needs 25 cents. Association needs 25 cents. State then has to pay for a 6 story building and new leather couches for execs every couple years. Then you have to totally reorganize the whole organization every odd year and print new letterhead and such. So by then they send 5 cents on to world causes.
John, Stigler - Dec 27, 2007 11:40 PM
Report as inappropriate
Aside from some out-of-context scriptures, like the one mentioned in the article, the New Testament always encourages generous giving and never encourages hording wealth or extravagant living. Although it is true that is was possible in the Old Testament, which is where these prosperity teachers dwell, including the Prayer of Jabez, that was an old testament prayer. You just never see it in the new. Maybe because of the last days the need will be greater and we are called to take up our cross and follow Jesus which includes not living the good life (materially speaking- it actually is the good live to live generously because ... "it's better to give that to receive").
I might also add that I think the evangelical church (that's most protestants) only gives between 1.7 and 2.5% of their income - about a forth of what we're supposed to be giving. And only about 5% of that goes to the great (GREAT=main reason we're here??) commission. And only 1% of that goes to unreached people groups. So that's about .0014% of the evangelical wealth that goes to reaching the unreached. So my challenge is that we need to give more and we need to give more to the whole reason Jesus left us on the earth. Thanks for reading.
mike, Midwest City - Dec 27, 2007 11:10 PM
Report as inappropriate
I'm going to repeat as closely as I can remember it what I posted earlier: Oral Roberts and his modern day imitators are scummy frauds. There is not a speck of Scriptural backing for the "prosperity doctrine". Imbeciles who give money to these slimy frauds, however, deserve any ill financial fortune that befalls them. And an addendum: the only people who could possibly be "offended" by that are the scumbag TV preachers/vultures themselves, or some imbecile who's actually forked over money to them.
Jason, Edmond - Dec 27, 2007 11:01 PM
Report as inappropriate
These guys are disgracing the name of God. They set up their churches to get money. These types of "churches" are the cults. I will never give money to these crooks.
Jeff, Edmond - Dec 27, 2007 10:15 PM
Report as inappropriate
That's exactly what I meant John...good read. I attended one of these non-denoms for awhile when I moved to NW OKC. The preacher claimed that his was a church for the un-churched. I wasn't un-churched myself, but someone had told me about the music at this "new church" in town, so I checked it out. It didn't look like a church at all. It reminded me of an abandoned warehouse made out of sheet-metal. When I walked in I didn't see any crosses or altars. The sermons were not more than 15 minutes long. There was nothing spoken about salvation, no invitations. And it was packed. When one of the local NEWS stations did a piece on area churches and the homes the pastors live in, one was the home of the pastor from that church I had attended. I wasn't surprised. I don't know about your part of town, but around here there are non-denoms renting spaces in the smaller strip malls. I even saw one nestled between a sports bar and a comedy club...which just proves you are right, they are popping up (all over) in town.
Dennis, Oklahoma City - Dec 27, 2007 7:59 PM
Report as inappropriate
I never have understood how a large percentage of people struggling to get by donate 10% or more to preachers who are taking their money and living lovely ...You would think common sense would start to creep in at some point and let them know something isn't on the up and up...I must admit organized religion is a pretty good racket
ROGER, MOORE - Dec 27, 2007 7:47 PM
Report as inappropriate
You bet Dennis. Look at all the non-denominational churches popping up in town. They could care less about what you believe, as long as you come to their building carrying cash.
John, Oklahoma City - Dec 27, 2007 7:00 PM
Report as inappropriate
They are not only on TV, they are also in our midst right here in Oklahoma City.
Dennis, Oklahoma City - Dec 27, 2007 6:20 PM
Report as inappropriate
"Pay unto Caesar that which is Caesar's, Pay unto God that which is God's" "A Camel will fit through the eye of a needle before a rich man gets into heaven" You know, if people cannot understand what is being said by Christ about money and wealth and how to seperate that from one's spiritual being, they simply deserve to be entrapped by these panhandlers and charlaitans in the guise of so called "preachers".
B, Geary - Dec 27, 2007 6:13 PM
Report as inappropriate
Doug, they HAVE been policing themselves, that's the problem. I believe that ALL tax exempt organizations should be required by LAW to fully disclose their assests (income) & liabilities (debts) and be subject to financial audits & disclosures. Some of these churches & church leaders have as many financial assests as some banks & stock brokers. Let them play by the rules that everyone else has to play by. Besides, if you don't have disclosure, how can we truly say that they are not investing their money in forbidden activities. Just look at the allegations of ORU using tax free dollars to promote politicians as an example. Even Jerry Falwell claimed he wanted Christianity incorporated into our laws. Do you think for one minute he didn't spend church money on political pursuits?
Concerned, Central Oklahoma - Dec 27, 2007 5:26 PM
Report as inappropriate
"Charity begins at home."; there are many fine Churches around the area that do good works and need support. These charlatans on TV are only after your money and have no qualms about lying or stealing. Personally I have deprogrammed the religious channels from all my televisions. None can be trusted till they police themselves.
Doug, Midwest City - Dec 27, 2007 4:27 PM
Report as inappropriate
Snakeoil will always sell; it just comes in bright, shiny video format nowadays :)
Ron, Oklahoma City - Dec 27, 2007 4:18 PM
Report as inappropriate
Well, the book of Malachi does talk about tithes and offerings. We just need to be careful who we give it to. I have tithed and my finances were good. When I didn't tithe, I was badly in debt so I know there is wealth in giving.
Suzan, Oklahoma City - Dec 27, 2007 4:05 PM
Report as inappropriate
Mass Marketing + Christianity = Televangelists
B, Geary - Dec 27, 2007 3:40 PM
Report as inappropriate
The "Name it and claim it" mentality is not limited to the TV preachers. However, those organizations are larger and therefore seen the most. It's unfortunate that folks can be'duped' so easily. Give your money to the poor and in need in person and you may get a much greater blessing than the one's that television evangelists promise. God does not need to 'sell' his blessings.
Raymond, Shawnee - Dec 27, 2007 3:33 PM
Report as inappropriate
I look forward to the day the United States of America has freedom FROM religion....
mister, bogata - Dec 27, 2007 3:06 PM
Report as inappropriate
I look forward to the day the United States of America has freedom FROM religion....
mister, bogata - Dec 27, 2007 3:06 PM
Report as inappropriate