Some different talking points about Indian Child Welfare Act
NewsOK Related Articles
ICWA “protects Indian parents from having their children removed for baseless reasons,” Cross writes. No children, regardless of race, should be removed from their homes for baseless reasons. Changes in child welfare laws require that child welfare officials work hard to ensure this doesn't happen. We don't need a law that protects just one class of children from baseless removals.
Cross contends it was a failure to comply with ICWA that led to the tragic custody battle in Baby Veronica's case. I disagree. It was the unfair exploitation of the law's loopholes that gave rights to a biological father who would have had no rights under state law, resulting in an innocent little girl's world being turned upside down in an instant. Ask members of Congress if that's what they intended when they passed ICWA. I think we know what their answers would be.
Moore, of Long Beach, Calif., is an adoptive father of six children, three of whom are part Indian. He is director and co-founder of Home Forever, and a founding member of the Coalition for the Protection of Indian Children & Families. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Voices Photo Galleriesview all
- 21543Oklahoma tornadoes: The 'Big Dog,' the little boy and the hug that triumphs over tragedy
- 10852Oklahoma tornadoes: Woman meets the military officer who shared the clothes off his back
- 8707Oklahoma tornadoes: Thunder reverses the role, takes a turn at cheering on the community
- 8666Finding Addyson – One family's struggle in the Moore tornado
- 8648Hobby Lobby argues case before federal judges
- 7837Blake Shelton's "Healing the Heartland" televised tornado benefit set for Wednesday at Chesapeake Energy Arena
- 7718Story behind the photo: Family members describe desperate search for one another after EF5 twister