Sri Lankan opposition pulls out of judge's hearing

 
No Author Published: December 7, 2012    Comment on this article Leave a comment

COLOMBO, Sri Lanka (AP) — Sri Lankan opposition lawmakers have withdrawn from a committee looking into impeachment charges against the country's chief justice, saying the process is flawed and unfair.

photo - Sri Lankan opposition lawmaker Rajavarothiam Sampanthan, foreground, leaves after addressing the media at the Parliament in Colombo, Sri Lanka, Friday, Dec. 7, 2012. Sri Lankan opposition lawmakers Friday withdrew from a committee looking into impeachment charges against Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake, saying the process is flawed and unfair. (AP Photo/Eranga Jayawardena)
Sri Lankan opposition lawmaker Rajavarothiam Sampanthan, foreground, leaves after addressing the media at the Parliament in Colombo, Sri Lanka, Friday, Dec. 7, 2012. Sri Lankan opposition lawmakers Friday withdrew from a committee looking into impeachment charges against Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake, saying the process is flawed and unfair. (AP Photo/Eranga Jayawardena)

Multimedia

The United States added to the criticism, saying the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake is "part of a disturbing deterioration of democratic norms in Sri Lanka."

The government of President Mahinda Rajapaksa accuses Bandaranayake of having unexplained wealth and misuse of office, but she denies any wrongdoing. The opposition says the impeachment is a move by the government to stifle judicial independence and concentrate more powers in the hands of Rajapaksa.

A parliamentary committee with seven government lawmakers and four opposition party members was appointed to look into the charges against the chief justice. Bandaranayake said Thursday that she would not appear before the committee again because she will not get a fair hearing.

On Friday, lawmaker John Amaratunga told reporters that four opposition lawmakers who sat on the committee walked out because they could not be party to an unfair process.

The lawmakers said the government members had used their numerical majority to reject what they said were reasonable demands to establish a procedure for the inquiry, and give Bandaranayake an opportunity to cross-examine her accusers and enough time to study the 300 documents relevant to the case.

The opposition said too many of the accusers and judges in the case were from the same group — government lawmakers, whereas in other countries such inquiries are assigned to separate legal professionals appointed by parliament.

Page 1 of 2




If you prefer your thoughts to appear in The Oklahoman's Opinion section, we encourage you to submit a letter to the editor.


New Rule in CALIFORNIA:
(APR 2013): If You Pay For Car Insurance You Better Read This...
www.ConsumerFinanceDaily.com
Mortgage Rates Hit 2.50%
White House Program Cuts Up to $1k off Monthly Payments! (2.90% APR)
www.SeeRefinanceRates.com

News Photo Galleriesview all