State expects $195M less

By Michael McNutt
Published: February 13, 2008

The Oklahoma Tax Commission significantly lowered its estimate Tuesday of how much tax money will be available for the 2009 fiscal year, which starts July 1.

Advertisement

The Tax Commission approved a revised estimate that state taxes will generate about $195 million less than it calculated in December for the 2009 fiscal year.

The biggest projected losses are corporate income taxes, which are $101.8 million below the December estimate, and individual income taxes, which are $65.5 million below the earlier estimate.

What that means to the budget still is being calculated, but the governor's chief budget adviser said Tuesday it appears lawmakers will have less to spend this year than last year. It's been five years since that happened, state Treasurer Scott Meacham said.

"In all probability, there's going to be some decrease,” said Meacham, who serves as secretary of revenue and finance.

It may be necessary for legislators to dip into the state's savings account, the Rainy Day Fund, which has been untouched the past five years, Meacham said. The fund has $571.6 million.

Why the numbers changed
A slowed-down Oklahoma economy along with record tax cuts the past three years are the main factors for the reduction in money available, Meacham said.

Continuing cuts in the income tax rate resulted in taking away $178.7 million that otherwise would have been available in this year's budget.

Income tax cuts during the 2009 fiscal year will account for another estimated $302 million less in state revenue.

Since taking effect in the 2007 fiscal year, the income tax cuts will amount to about $565 million through the end of the 2009 fiscal year.

"We're going to have to tighten our belt much more than we thought even in December,” Meacham said.

The December estimate showed legislators would have about $32 million more to spend than last year.

What does it mean?
Legislative leaders urged caution in spending and funding any proposals or increases.

House Speaker Chris Benge, R-Tulsa, said he wasn't surprised by the estimates.

"It is something we have been watching and will continue to be cautious as we begin budget negotiations this session,” he said. "This will simply mean we must continue to search out ways to make government more efficient and find savings where we can, which also was supported recently by Gov. Brad Henry in his executive budget.”

The governor's proposed $1,200 teacher pay raises, estimated to cost $68.5 million annually, and a 5 percent pay raise for state employees, estimated to cost $65.4 million annually, appear to be in trouble.

"The governor's priorities remain the same,” Meacham said. "You have to figure out a way to obviously make those priorities work in the overall budget framework.”

Lowered estimates mean less money for roads and bridges. December's estimate showed an economic growth of at least 3 percent, which would have meant $50 million in new funding for the state Transportation Department. Growth less than 3 percent reduces new money for the Transportation Department to $17.5 million.

More bad news?
State revenue reports released Tuesday also painted a gloomy picture. Collections for January came in 6.7 percent below the previous year.

Corporate income tax collections for the month totaled $9.3 million, falling below January of last year by $15.5 million or 62.4 percent.

Personal income tax collections totaled $249.9 million for the month, falling short of the prior year by $24.2 million or 8.8 percent.

What's next?
The state finance office will break down the Tax Commission estimates and come up with more detailed figures of how much money legislators will have to spend. It will report its findings to the state Board of Equalization, which meets Feb. 19 to certify final revenue estimates for this session.


Toolbar sponsored by: David Stanley Ford
Bookmark and Share



Comments

Thank you for joining our conversations on NewsOK.com. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.

Editor's note: It is not our intent to offer comments on crime or fatality stories.

Leave a comment. Log in below or sign up (it's free).

   
THIS is why you DO NOT rely on income tax. It is MUCH more volatile than Sales Taxes. Ultimately all income taxes need to be eliminated. Look at Texas and Florida - they do not have these problems (and they do not have income taxes).
A, oklahoma city - Feb 14, 2008 11:51 AM
Report as inappropriate
“The good news: State sees surprise lift” (1/16/08) [http://newsok.com/article/3193335/1200464696] WOW...just a month ago it was good news from Mr. Meacham... “Compared with the same month a year ago, sales tax receipts were up 18 percent on hotel rooms, up 14½ percent on building materials and up 8 percent on restaurants, he said.... December’s strong tax collections likely mean more money for the state’s roads and bridges. It appears revenue projections for the upcoming fiscal year will be at least 3 percent above this fiscal year, said Meacham, who fretted last month that the ice storm could seriously curtail sales tax receipts.” and what happened to the 100 million more the Governor’s office found? “Legislators have more to spend” (2/5/08) [http://newsok.com/article/3200851/1202189412] “... the December figures came in and we’re $90 million over the estimate.” Why can't the people over at the Capitol get there act together? We have to get this State on sound financial footing. We have to stop spending/budgeting on what MIGHT come in next year. It doesn't seem to matter which party is in the Governor's Mansion (Keating had the same problem as Henry) Either projections are way over or under. Why are the people that are coming up with this stuff still employed? The solution is simple but not easy. You spend the coming year what was collected this year. No guessing, no forecasting. You know what you have. Period.
Larry, Oklahoma City - Feb 13, 2008 10:57 PM
Report as inappropriate
Did everyone under Meacham go to the OU School of Meteorology? Weathermen change their forecasts less often. The best way to increase pay to state employees is to get rid of a bunch of them.
JoJo, Cobb, OK - Feb 13, 2008 10:06 AM
Report as inappropriate
They may need to increase taxes rather than patting themselves on the back for driving everybody to the poor house! Also, if you don't pay state employees, how are you going to get all those wonderful things the legislators think up done?
Southern, Oklahoma City - Feb 13, 2008 7:14 AM
Report as inappropriate
Lets be sure and pass the tax to fund the arena improvements so we can all bury our heads in the sand and ignore how bad things really are in Oklahoma !!!
mister, bogata - Feb 13, 2008 6:16 AM
Report as inappropriate