In commission filings, rural telephone companies said it would be fairer to move funding to the Oklahoma Universal Service Fund.
“Likewise, we believe such a change would result in a smaller surcharge to a larger base of contributors that would include all customers (wireless and Voice over Internet Protocol) who have access to the rural company's networks to terminate calls,” said Craig Cook, who filed testimony on behalf of more than 35 rural telephone companies.
The High Cost Fund has paid about $37.1 million each year to rural telephone companies in Oklahoma since 1996, Verizon's Don Price said in his testimony. That funding has stayed the same even though the telecommunications market has changed drastically since then.
“Thus, in some cases, the surcharges may exceed the charges for the long-distance service itself,” Price said. “The fund, therefore, imposes a severe financial burden on Oklahoma's telecommunications consumers that is, to my knowledge, unprecedented among the states.”
Price said the High Cost Fund was intended to be temporary and to ease the transition to competition for rural phone companies when it was established.
The wireless companies also argued they weren't involved in negotiations on the proposed settlement, even though the Oklahoma Universal Service Fund is assessed on their customers.
Administrative Law Judge Jacqueline T. Miller recommended the three-person Corporation Commission approve the proposed settlement. She said regulators and an independent third-party would review disbursements to rural phone companies to make sure they're not receiving more money than they are entitled.