Share “Witness breaks down in NYC stop-and-frisk...”

Witness breaks down in NYC stop-and-frisk trial

Published on NewsOK Modified: March 19, 2013 at 7:10 pm •  Published: March 19, 2013

NEW YORK (AP) — A nonprofit worker wept on the witness stand Tuesday as he described an unnerving episode of being handcuffed near his home while an officer took his keys and went inside his building.

Nicholas Peart, a 24-year-old black man, is one of about a dozen New Yorkers expected to tell their stories of being stopped, questioned and frisked by police in a federal trial challenging how police use the tactic. About 5 million stops have been made during the past decade, mostly of black and Hispanic men.

The lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of some of the stops, with lawyers arguing the policy unfairly targets minorities.

City attorneys said officers operate within the law and do not target people solely because of their race. Police go where the crime is, and crime is overwhelmingly in minority neighborhoods, city lawyers said.

Peart's mother died of cancer, and he is the guardian of his three siblings, two small boys and his disabled 20-year-old sister. The stocky community college graduate testified that he was stopped four times, starting on his 18th birthday.

But it was a stop in 2011 that reduced him to tears.

He testified that he was walking to the corner store at about 11 p.m. to get milk when officers stopped him, handcuffed him and put him in the back of a squad car. One officer took Peart's keys, he said, and went into his building. Peart said he was concerned because he didn't know how his siblings would react if the officer knocked on the door.

"I was afraid he would go into my apartment, and I wasn't there to take care of the situation," he said.

Eventually the officer returned and he was freed.

Peart, pausing to collect himself, said he felt criminalized by the episode.

"To be treated like that, by someone who works for New York City, I felt degraded and helpless," he said.

City lawyers played audio recordings in an effort to show some of the stops were justified. In one case, officers stopped Peart and his two companions because three crime suspects seen in the area were wearing nearly identical clothing, according to a radio call. The lawyers also sought to discredit witnesses by suggesting their stories had evolved to become more dramatic and their memories were faulty.

Peart testified that he filed one complaint against police where he lied and said he had been physically injured. He also said one of the stops happened in May 2011, not April 2011, had trouble recalling the race and descriptions of officers who stopped him and published angry Facebook posts insulting the police department.

Continue reading this story on the...