Share “'Two powerful forces' that are making...”


Deseret Digital Media NewsOK publishes content from Deseret Digital Media, which has a network of websites that includes KSL.com, DeseretNews.com and FamilyShare.com.

'Two powerful forces' that are making American families more fragile

The American family has become less stable because of two forces that are battering its once-stable foundations. That doesn't mean either factor is bad, but the combination can seriously shake things up.
Lois M. Collins, Deseret News Modified: July 29, 2014 at 5:41 pm •  Published: July 29, 2014
Advertisement

The American family has become less stable because of two shifts that have combined to batter its once-solid foundations, according to a family expert.

"Over the past 40 years, the geography of family life has been destablized by two powerful forces pulling in opposite directions and occasionally scraping against each other, much like tectonic plates," wrote Stephanie Coontz, professor at Evergreen State College and director of research for the Council on Contemporary Families, in an opinion piece this week for The New York Times.

"One is the striking progress toward equality between men and women. The other is the equally striking growth of socioeconomic inequality and insecurity," she wrote.

She describes the internal workings of families as "more egalitarian," with more women working outside the home for pay than in years past and more men helping out within the home as well. Women now have more security in the workforce, including more equal pay and stature and more legal rights, she said.

"But while the sexes have become more equal, society as a whole has become far less producing especially deep losses for young men," she said. "In 1969, by the time men reached age 25, three-quarters were earning wages that could support a family of four above the poverty line. By 2004, it took until age 30 for the same percentage of men to reach this income level. And while in 1969 only 10 percent of men ages 30 to 35 were still low earner, by 2004, almost a quarter of men in that age range remained low earners."

Continue reading this story on the...