LONDON (AP) — Britain's Court of Appeal has backed a judgment that Samsung's Galaxy tablet computer is "not as cool" as Apple's iPad — and therefore doesn't infringe Apple's rights.
The panel's upholding of the findings of by a lower court endorses the U.K. judgment which made headlines around the world when it was handed down in July. Judge Colin Birss had then gushed over Apple's design, while knocking back the company's case against its rival.
"The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking," Birss wrote at the time, enthusing over its "undecorated flat surfaces," its "very thin rim" and "crisp edge."
"It is an understated, smooth and simple product," Birss wrote, saying that Samsung's products "are not as cool."
On Thursday, the Court of Appeal agreed unanimously with Birss, with Judge Robin Jacob ordering Apple to publicize the court rulings to make sure consumers knew that Samsung wasn't a copycat.
"The acknowledgement must come from the horse's mouth," Jacob said. "Nothing short of that will be sure to do the job completely."
Kim Walker, a partner with English law firm Thomas Eggar LLP, said that the ruling was an endorsement of Samsung's originality — if not its design.
"It appears that you don't have to be cool to be original when it comes to intellectual property rights," she wrote in an email. "You just have to be different!"
16 Week Curriculum With Instructions, Lesson Plans & CNG Conversion Kit