NORMAN- A ban on smoking and chewing tobacco has taken effect at Oklahoma State University, but that doesn't necessarily mean the state's other major university will be following suit.
Featured Gallery
Advertisement
State law bans smoking inside buildings at the University of Oklahoma, and spokeswoman Catherine Bishop said it's also prohibited within 25 feet of all building entrances. So far, though, there hasn't been grassroots support for banning the practice everywhere else on campus.
The issue was brought up this spring in a Student Congress after Oklahoma State approved its policy last year, which went into effect Tuesday. Student Congress chair Kurt Davidson said it was never even made into a formal resolution.
"It was one of those issues that was brought up but there wasn't any traction," Davidson said.
Bishop said in an e-mail that university President David Boren would want input from students, faculty and staff governance groups before considering any smoking ban. If there was support, Boren would appoint a task force to study the issue and suggest an implementation plan.
"While no decision has been made at this point, the university is open to consideration of turning the Norman campus into a tobacco-free campus," Bishop said.
The university's Health Sciences Center in Oklahoma City is already smoke-free.
The Oklahoma State policy contains a few exceptions. There are designated areas near student housing and parking lots leased for tailgating before sporting events where smoking will be allowed.
"Certainly something like this was a change in lifestyle for some people," Oklahoma State spokesman Gary Shutt said. "You're never going to have 100 percent concurrence in a change like this."
Davidson said he doesn't expect the University of Oklahoma to implement its own ban unless something happens to catalyze student opinion.
"There has not been a huge outcry (at OU) like there has been at other college campuses," Davidson said.
Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.
What I don't get is the argument that it's against "individual rights." Please. It's been done overseas for years and already several states here. It's our collective responsibility to enact these kinds of regulations to prevent ourselves, as a society, from killing ourselves from substances and activities that we know kills.
It has nothing to do with control and everything to do with responsibility. If you have to smoke, no one is preventing you. Just do it in a place that doesn't infringe on another's right to not have to inhale it.
When are we finally going to get enough of institutions taking our rights away. Smoking tobacco is legal. Smoking outside is harmless. Beware those of you who applaud such actions. One day they will come after some of your freedoms. It must stop.
Well, I never thought I would say this, but OU has it right this time. I am so sick and tired of people regulating a perfectly legal activity. Do not give me the crap about "we have to walk through it", etc. Big deal, the 3 seconds you have to walk through it is not going to kill you. Quite frankly I would rather walk around smokers than some people who do not understand the term moderation with cologne/perfume or the opposite end of the spectrum.
4
Featured Gallery
Prev
Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online
Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.
Log in below or sign up (it's free).
It has nothing to do with control and everything to do with responsibility. If you have to smoke, no one is preventing you. Just do it in a place that doesn't infringe on another's right to not have to inhale it.