Upon further review, new system is praised despite sour reaction to ball transfer rule

Published on NewsOK Modified: April 24, 2014 at 7:07 am •  Published: April 24, 2014
Advertisement
;

DALLAS — Let the record show Texas Rangers general manager Jon Daniels and manager Ron Washington endorse Major League Baseball’s replay system.

“Considering this is the first rollout, the system is excellent,” Daniels said.

Said Washington: “Overall, it’s good. They’re getting the plays right.”

Washington hesitated before continuing.

“That one play has to be corrected.”

“That one play” is the literal application of the transfer rule, which requires a fielder to show full control of the ball to record an out. That switch and the new, hazy standards concerning plays at the plate are causing the most complaints about replays.

There has been carping about managers stopping games by taking multiple slow walks to an umpire, giving their staffs more time to judge if a challenge should be made, and camera angles.

There were two episodes during the high-profile Boston-New York Yankees series two weeks ago. Major league baseball admitted a mistake in not overturning a safe call for Dean Anna of the Yankees because it did not immediately have the video angle showing a tag while he was off second base. Boston manager John Farrell earned the first replay-caused ejection for arguing the replay was inconclusive on a call that went against his club.

“We’ve had really very little controversy overall,” commissioner Bud Selig said last week at the MLB Diversity Business Summit. “Everything in life will have a little glitch here and there when you do something new.

“Are our guys on top of that? You bet.”

There could be adjustments soon. Foxsports.com reported MLB and Major League Baseball Players Association are discussing clarifications to the transfer and home-plate standards.

The transfer call is the biggest of the glitches. It is reminiscent of 1988, when MLB ordered umpires to be more vigorous in calling balks, and the aborted move to more high strikes in the early 1990s. Bureaucracy has affected the balance of the game.

The Rangers were twice victimized by the transfer rule in the first 13 games, when catcher J.P. Arencibia and shortstop Elvis Andrus each dropped the ball preparing to throw to first to complete a double play. They are not the only team unhappy with the revised interpretation of the rule.

At the start of the past weekend, there had been eight appeals based on a transfer play. In each instance, the fielder was ruled to have dropped the baseball, and the runner was safe.

“It’s confusing,” said Seattle Mariners manager Lloyd McClendon, whose club benefitted from the ruling against Arencibia last week. “I’m as frustrated as the next person. You try to be politically correct with your statements, but I’m really worried about where we’re heading with replay, the effect it’s having on the game and the fans.”

The transfer rule has long been on the book. Joe Torre, MLB’s executive vice president of baseball operations, managed Atlanta in 1982 when the Braves lost a pennant-race game because the ball came out of left fielder Terry Harper’s glove as he hurdled a fence in foul territory after a long running catch. Torre did not argue the call.

The application of the rule has been modified.

Outfielders were given the out if they closed their gloves on the ball and took several steps. A drop after that was seen as in the act of throwing, a different play than the catch.

Continue reading this story on the...